Re: Testing stable backports for netfilter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:28:29AM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> On 11/06/24 03:29, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:51:53PM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> > > Hello netfilter developers,
> > > 
> > > Do we have any tests that we could run before sending a stable backport in
> > > netfilter/ subsystem to stable@vger ?
> > > 
> > > Let us say we have a CVE fix which is only backported till 5.10.y but it is
> > > needed is 5.4.y and 4.19.y, the backport might need to easy to make, just
> > > fixing some conflicts due to contextual changes or missing commits.
> > 
> > Which one in particular is missing?
> 
> I was planning to backport the fix for CVE-2023-52628 onto 5.4.y and 4.19.y
> trees.
> 
> lts-5.10       : v5.10.198             - a7d86a77c33b netfilter: nftables:
> exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write
>   lts-5.15       : v5.15.132             - 1ad7b189cc14 netfilter: nftables:
> exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write
>   lts-6.1        : v6.1.54               - d9ebfc0f2137 netfilter: nftables:
>
> exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write
>   mainline       : v6.6-rc1              - fd94d9dadee5 netfilter: nftables:
> exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write

This is information is incorrect.

This fix is already in 6.1 -stable.

commit d9ebfc0f21377690837ebbd119e679243e0099cc
Author: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Sep 5 23:13:56 2023 +0200

    netfilter: nftables: exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write

    [ Upstream commit fd94d9dadee58e09b49075240fe83423eb1dcd36 ]




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux