On 5/7/24 10:04 PM, Brad Cowie wrote:
@@ -84,16 +102,6 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
else
test_einval_bpf_tuple = opts_def.error;
- opts_def.reserved[0] = 1;
- ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
- sizeof(opts_def));
- opts_def.reserved[0] = 0;
- opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
- if (ct)
- bpf_ct_release(ct);
- else
- test_einval_reserved = opts_def.error;
-
opts_def.netns_id = -2;
ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
This non-zero reserved[0] test is still valid and useful. How about create a new
test_einval_reserved_new for testing the new struct?
pw-bot: cr
[ Sorry for the delay. I have some backlog. ].