Re: [nf-next PATCH 0/5] Dynamic hook interface binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Phil,

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 09:50:40PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Currently, netdev-family chains and flowtables expect their interfaces
> to exist at creation time. In practice, this bites users of virtual
> interfaces if these happen to be created after the nftables service
> starts up and loads the stored ruleset.
> 
> Vice-versa, if an interface disappears at run-time (via module unloading
> or 'ip link del'), it also disappears from the ruleset, along with the
> chain and its rules which binds to it. This is at least problematic for
> setups which store the running ruleset during system shutdown.
> 
> This series attempts to solve these problems by effectively making
> netdev hooks name-based: If no matching interface is found at hook
> creation time, it will be inactive until a matching interface appears.
> If a bound interface is renamed, a matching inactive hook is searched
> for it.
> 
> Ruleset dumps will stabilize in that regard. To still provide
> information about which existing interfaces a chain/flowtable currently
> binds to, new netlink attributes *_ACT_DEVS are introduced which are
> filled from the active hooks only.
> 
> This series is also prep work for a simple ildcard interface binding
> similar to the wildcard interface matching in meta expression. It should
> suffice to turn struct nft_hook::ops into an array of all matching
> interfaces, but the respective code does not exist yet.

Before taking a closer look: Would it be possible to have a torture
test to exercise this path from userspace?

Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux