Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Update tests for new ct zone opts for nf_conntrack kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/23/24 8:00 PM, Brad Cowie wrote:
Remove test for reserved options in bpf_ct_opts,
which have been removed.

Add test for allocating and looking up ct entry in a
non-default ct zone with kfuncs bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_alloc
and bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_lookup.

Add negative test for looking up ct entry in a different
ct zone to where it was allocated.

Signed-off-by: Brad Cowie <brad@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2:
   - Separate test changes into different patch
   - Add test for allocating/looking up entry in non-default ct zone
---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config            |  1 +
  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c |  6 +-
  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++---
  3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index afd675b1bf80..8d4110fe8d26 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CT=y
  CONFIG_NETKIT=y
  CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y
  CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
+CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ZONES=y
  CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4=y
  CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6=y
  CONFIG_NF_NAT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
index b30ff6b3b81a..853f694af6d4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
@@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ static void test_bpf_nf_ct(int mode)
  		goto end;
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_bpf_tuple, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for NULL bpf_tuple");
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_reserved, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for reserved not set to 0");
  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_netns_id, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for netns_id < -1");
  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_len_opts, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for len__opts != NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ");
  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_eproto_l4proto, -EPROTO, "Test EPROTO for l4proto != TCP or UDP");
@@ -122,6 +121,11 @@ static void test_bpf_nf_ct(int mode)
  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_exist_lookup_mark, 43, "Test existing connection lookup ctmark");
  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_snat_addr, 0, "Test for source natting");
  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_dnat_addr, 0, "Test for destination natting");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_ct_zone_id_alloc_entry, 0, "Test for alloc new entry in specified ct zone");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_ct_zone_id_insert_entry, 0, "Test for insert new entry in specified ct zone");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_ct_zone_id_succ_lookup, 0, "Test for successful lookup in specified ct_zone");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_ct_zone_id_enoent_lookup, -ENOENT, "Test ENOENT for lookup in wrong ct zone");
+
  end:
  	if (client_fd != -1)
  		close(client_fd);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
index 77ad8adf68da..b47fa0708f1e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
  extern unsigned long CONFIG_HZ __kconfig;
int test_einval_bpf_tuple = 0;
-int test_einval_reserved = 0;
  int test_einval_netns_id = 0;
  int test_einval_len_opts = 0;
  int test_eproto_l4proto = 0;
@@ -22,6 +21,10 @@ int test_eafnosupport = 0;
  int test_alloc_entry = -EINVAL;
  int test_insert_entry = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
  int test_succ_lookup = -ENOENT;
+int test_ct_zone_id_alloc_entry = -EINVAL;
+int test_ct_zone_id_insert_entry = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+int test_ct_zone_id_succ_lookup = -ENOENT;
+int test_ct_zone_id_enoent_lookup = 0;
  u32 test_delta_timeout = 0;
  u32 test_status = 0;
  u32 test_insert_lookup_mark = 0;
@@ -45,7 +48,10 @@ struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
  	s32 netns_id;
  	s32 error;
  	u8 l4proto;
-	u8 reserved[3];
+	u8 dir;
+	u16 ct_zone_id;
+	u8 ct_zone_flags;
+	u8 ct_zone_dir;

Create a new struct instead of modifying the existing one such that the existing test can test the size 12 still works.

The new one can use the ___new suffix like "struct bpf_ct_opts___new".

  } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
struct nf_conn *bpf_xdp_ct_alloc(struct xdp_md *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
@@ -84,16 +90,6 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
  	else
  		test_einval_bpf_tuple = opts_def.error;
- opts_def.reserved[0] = 1;
-	ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
-		       sizeof(opts_def));
-	opts_def.reserved[0] = 0;
-	opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
-	if (ct)
-		bpf_ct_release(ct);
-	else
-		test_einval_reserved = opts_def.error;
-
  	opts_def.netns_id = -2;
  	ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
  		       sizeof(opts_def));
@@ -220,10 +216,77 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
  	}
  }
+static __always_inline void
+nf_ct_zone_id_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+						struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32),
+		   struct nf_conn *(*alloc_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+					       struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32),
+		   void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_ct_opts___local opts_def = { .l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP, .netns_id = -1 };
+	struct bpf_sock_tuple bpf_tuple;
+	struct nf_conn *ct;
+
+	__builtin_memset(&bpf_tuple, 0, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4));
+
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.saddr = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* src IP */
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.daddr = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* dst IP */
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.sport = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* src port */
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.dport = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* dst port */
+
+	/* use non-default ct zone */
+	opts_def.ct_zone_id = 10;

Can the ct_zone_flags and ct_zone_dir be tested also?

pw-bot: cr

+	ct = alloc_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+		      sizeof(opts_def));
+	if (ct) {
+		__u16 sport = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		__u16 dport = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		union nf_inet_addr saddr = {};
+		union nf_inet_addr daddr = {};
+		struct nf_conn *ct_ins;
+
+		bpf_ct_set_timeout(ct, 10000);
+
+		/* snat */
+		saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
+		/* dnat */
+		daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
+
+		ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
+		if (ct_ins) {
+			struct nf_conn *ct_lk;
+
+			/* entry should exist in same ct zone we inserted it */
+			ct_lk = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4),
+					  &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+			if (ct_lk) {
+				bpf_ct_release(ct_lk);
+				test_ct_zone_id_succ_lookup = 0;
+			}
+
+			/* entry should not exist in default ct zone */
+			opts_def.ct_zone_id = 0;
+			ct_lk = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4),
+					  &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+			if (ct_lk)
+				bpf_ct_release(ct_lk);
+			else
+				test_ct_zone_id_enoent_lookup = opts_def.error;
+
+			bpf_ct_release(ct_ins);
+			test_ct_zone_id_insert_entry = 0;
+		}
+		test_ct_zone_id_alloc_entry = 0;
+	}
+}
+
  SEC("xdp")
  int nf_xdp_ct_test(struct xdp_md *ctx)
  {
  	nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_xdp_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_xdp_ct_alloc, ctx);
+	nf_ct_zone_id_test((void *)bpf_xdp_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_xdp_ct_alloc, ctx);
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -231,6 +294,7 @@ SEC("tc")
  int nf_skb_ct_test(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
  {
  	nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_skb_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_skb_ct_alloc, ctx);
+	nf_ct_zone_id_test((void *)bpf_skb_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_skb_ct_alloc, ctx);
  	return 0;
  }





[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux