On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 02:28 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:37:16AM +0000, Jianbo Liu wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-03-22 at 13:27 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > Hi Jianbo, > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:41:46AM +0000, Jianbo Liu wrote: > > > > Hi Florian and Pablo, > > > > > > > > We hit the following warning from br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180. > > > > > > Can you give a try to this patch? > > > > > > > Sorry, it doesn't fix. > > It looks fine when running the test manually. But the warning still > > appeared in our regression tests. > > You mean different test triggers now the warning splat? It should be the same. The test I run manually was configured by the scripts I posted in this thread. > > Not sure yet if this is the bug that is triggering the issue in your > testbed yet, but I find it odd that packets hitting the local_in hook > because promisc flag is set on can confirm conntrack entries. > This fix seems ok. I didn't see the warning or any other issue. Thanks! Jianbo > Would you please give a try to this patch? Thanks!
