Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_tables: allow NFPROTO_INET in nft_(match/target)_validate()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ignat,

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:33:08AM +0000, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> Commit d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family") added
> some validation of NFPROTO_* families in the nft_compat module, but it broke
> the ability to use legacy iptables modules in dual-stack nftables.
> 
> While with legacy iptables one had to independently manage IPv4 and IPv6
> tables, with nftables it is possible to have dual-stack tables sharing the
> rules. Moreover, it was possible to use rules based on legacy iptables
> match/target modules in dual-stack nftables.
> 
> As an example, the program from [2] creates an INET dual-stack family table
> using an xt_bpf based rule, which looks like the following (the actual output
> was generated with a patched nft tool as the current nft tool does not parse
> dual stack tables with legacy match rules, so consider it for illustrative
> purposes only):
> 
> table inet testfw {
>   chain input {
>     type filter hook prerouting priority filter; policy accept;
>     bytecode counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept
>   }
> }

This nft command does not exist in tree, this does not restores fine
with nft -f. It provides a misleading hint to the reader.

I am fine with restoring this because you use it, but you have to find
a better interface than using nft_compat to achieve this IMO.

The upstream consensus this far is not to expose nft_compat features
through userspace nft. But as said, I understand and I am fine with
restoring kernel behaviour so you can keep going with your out-of-tree
patch.

Thanks !

> After d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family") we get
> EOPNOTSUPP for the above program.
> 
> Fix this by allowing NFPROTO_INET for nft_(match/target)_validate(), but also
> restrict the functions to classic iptables hooks.
> 
> Changes in v3:
>   * clarify that upstream nft will not display such configuration properly and
>     that the output was generated with a patched nft tool
>   * remove example program from commit description and link to it instead
>   * no code changes otherwise
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   * restrict nft_(match/target)_validate() to classic iptables hooks
>   * rewrite example program to use unmodified libnftnl
> 
> Fixes: d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zc1PfoWN38UuFJRI@calendula/T/#mc947262582c90fec044c7a3398cc92fac7afea72 [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240220145509.53357-1-ignat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]
> Reported-by: Jordan Griege <jgriege@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nft_compat.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
> index 1f9474fefe84..d3d11dede545 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
> @@ -359,10 +359,20 @@ static int nft_target_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>  
>  	if (ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV4 &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV6 &&
> +	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_INET &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_BRIDGE &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_ARP)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> +	ret = nft_chain_validate_hooks(ctx->chain,
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_FORWARD) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	if (nft_is_base_chain(ctx->chain)) {
>  		const struct nft_base_chain *basechain =
>  						nft_base_chain(ctx->chain);
> @@ -610,10 +620,20 @@ static int nft_match_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>  
>  	if (ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV4 &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV6 &&
> +	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_INET &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_BRIDGE &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_ARP)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> +	ret = nft_chain_validate_hooks(ctx->chain,
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_FORWARD) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	if (nft_is_base_chain(ctx->chain)) {
>  		const struct nft_base_chain *basechain =
>  						nft_base_chain(ctx->chain);
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux