Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nf_conncount: Use KMEM_CACHE() instead of kmem_cache_create()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nf_conncount: Use KMEM_CACHE() instead of kmem_cache_create()
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:34:59 +0100
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240123024631.396631-1-chentao@kylinos.cn>
Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:fbPKtf/JPZY=;sgJWmdXtWZFvN7UxGJ2XVWET5uf 0rjAClmMxvbIQhxLMWsgG9If2ddardVD1W5qH8kFq5elE+jt2ESUlAxd0/16LNJkahxamOpHM rBFOayVIBCSE7penEwQopZZIZxWAqO8uRle454OGP8G5GfEGXDAmaWtld8NDWrVA394lwe4kJ +goe2b3rOZ5g5HPEyt9n3bO1larbB1mAGQr1EZeZnV0tr6fArRU20tqvWy7mZ/puC9EI3YhE9 GsJBDSNiP2hi9OCJeNSjI78UBHYYhfloZ3ndVNT1W1x2F59X0HKHivp/HtNIBq24/5ElRUvx6 7bXKNIiZY5Cjqnd2Kx9ylpFVV4OFCOyuE0Da2pLlevE+yawJgJfItmzCaAqECzOj92wGbetrE BcmqanflwVvoM5IYqkZblx2POmitvm5bbngGqvF6UqrbaNzmVq4SAzoKduXnbmbVI103Weibn NRLqyQXan0zsiDHR9Z26xeRUXsIoBqTDpZ1B0K2OblQwDjZkFVypsBvuiREQirP2qdL5muvjJ sJWdPoyExdgorIqH2ZfOmdy4I7+dYMrwS9LqvdJoYlgW8esT6qZkcmqGITZaTNRZ5A2q+UQXv MvhShA+G9zFEqsYMPvoCYnQVUZaAAjeDoEeMzu9j9+VBYLaBp0ucA+6+/7meIs1URUrRion69 CAiMwOtHjZjqKbIA0vsxR5atMQqbfcofJHLYNX+ZOsvtZy+RGZ7BOE/n23Ebn0R6mq5Ogl7rm is6ITHQP2x4Tf1TUUJotyGCHWh3T9faJwTs0iwh6qhjOy5HL0PbVKluAd2DYWv+yGMK1ZyMZO j2602NkPUGPIV0IUWqMGcAmTjoH1GVt2OJnCh1a28ZhBV6MA8Q0V4MpBDec/Gln3svwYROLeK ApHoM467gZG/m8dR2DVChHp2F4ih4qWWIfw6GNGnLEUq/oxkkTz6LoKDg3JHahUTSLWqxbdL5 ZdSUSw==
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

> Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
> to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.

I suggest to replace the word “new” by a reference to the commit 8eb8284b412906181357c2b0110d879d5af95e52
("usercopy: Prepare for usercopy whitelisting").

See also related background information from 2017-06-10.

Regards,
Markus

References:
- [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nf_conncount: Use KMEM_CACHE instead of kmem_cache_create()
  - From: Kunwu Chan

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] netfilter: nat: restore default DNAT behavior
Next by Date: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Annotate kfuncs in .BTF_ids section
Previous by thread: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nf_conncount: Use KMEM_CACHE instead of kmem_cache_create()
Next by thread: [iptables PATCH] iptables: Add missing error codes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]