Hi Simon,
Thanks for your reply.
On 2024/1/17 17:29, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 03:20:45PM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Kunwu Chan,
I think this is more of a cleanup than a fix,
so it should probably be targeted at 'nf-next' rather than 'net'.
Thanks, I'm confused about when to use "nf-next" or "net" or "net-next".
"nf-next" means fixing errors for linux-next.git and linux-stable.git,
while "nf" or "next" just means linux-next.git?
If it is a fix, then I would suggest targeting it at 'nf'
and providing a Fixes tag.
I'll keep it in mind in the future.
The above notwithstanding, this looks good to me.
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
index a743db073887..98d7dbe3d787 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
@@ -1511,9 +1511,7 @@ int __init ip_vs_conn_init(void)
return -ENOMEM;
/* Allocate ip_vs_conn slab cache */
- ip_vs_conn_cachep = kmem_cache_create("ip_vs_conn",
- sizeof(struct ip_vs_conn), 0,
- SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
+ ip_vs_conn_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(ip_vs_conn, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN);
if (!ip_vs_conn_cachep) {
kvfree(ip_vs_conn_tab);
return -ENOMEM;
--
Thanks,
Kunwu
