5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 0c2a85edd143162b3a698f31e94bf8cdc041da87 upstream.
The patch that adds support for stateful expressions in set definitions
require this.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -3852,7 +3852,7 @@ err1:
return err;
}
-static void nft_set_destroy(struct nft_set *set)
+static void nft_set_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set)
{
if (WARN_ON(set->use > 0))
return;
@@ -4024,7 +4024,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_tables_deactivate_s
void nf_tables_destroy_set(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set)
{
if (list_empty(&set->bindings) && nft_set_is_anonymous(set))
- nft_set_destroy(set);
+ nft_set_destroy(ctx, set);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_tables_destroy_set);
@@ -6715,7 +6715,7 @@ static void nft_commit_release(struct nf
nf_tables_rule_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_rule(trans));
break;
case NFT_MSG_DELSET:
- nft_set_destroy(nft_trans_set(trans));
+ nft_set_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_set(trans));
break;
case NFT_MSG_DELSETELEM:
nf_tables_set_elem_destroy(&trans->ctx,
@@ -7176,7 +7176,7 @@ static void nf_tables_abort_release(stru
nf_tables_rule_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_rule(trans));
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWSET:
- nft_set_destroy(nft_trans_set(trans));
+ nft_set_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_set(trans));
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWSETELEM:
nft_set_elem_destroy(nft_trans_elem_set(trans),
@@ -7951,7 +7951,7 @@ static void __nft_release_table(struct n
list_for_each_entry_safe(set, ns, &table->sets, list) {
list_del(&set->list);
nft_use_dec(&table->use);
- nft_set_destroy(set);
+ nft_set_destroy(&ctx, set);
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, ne, &table->objects, list) {
nft_obj_del(obj);
