Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/8] netfilter: make nf_flowtable lifetime differ from container struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The work queue for hw offload (or ndo ops) are not used.
> OK, but is it possible to combine this XDP approach with hardware
> offload?

Yes.  We could disallow it if you prefer.

Ordering is, for ingress packet processing:
HW -> XDP -> nf flowtable -> classic forward path

instead of:

HW -> nf flowtable -> classic forward path

For the existing design.

> > If the xdp program can't handle it packet will be pushed up the stack,
> > i.e. nf ingress hook will handle it next.
> Then, only very simple scenarios will benefit from this acceleration.

Yes.  I don't see a reason to worry about more complex things right now.
E.g. PPPoE encap can be added later.

Or do you think this has to be added right from the very beginning?

I hope not.

> > > My understand is that XDP is all about programmibility, if user
> > > decides to go for XDP then simply fully implement the fast path is the
> > > XDP framework? I know of software already does so and they are
> > > perfectly fine with this approach.
> > 
> > I don't understand, you mean no integration at all?
> I mean, fully implement a fastpath in XDP/BPF using the datastructures
> that it provides.

I think its very bad for netfilter.

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux