Thomas Haller <thaller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> static inline void *__memory_allocation_check(const char *file, unsigned line, const void *ptr) {
> if (!ptr)
> __memory_allocation_error(file, line);
> return (void*) ptr;
> }
>
> #define memory_allocation_check(cmd) \
> ((typeof(cmd) __memory_allocation_check(__FILE__, __LINE__, (cmd))
>
> Doesn't seem to make a difference either way.
We seem to be moving in circles.
I suspect your agenda is to avoid repeating the existing
x = alloc()
if (!x)
barf()
pattern when adding userhandle support?
If so I think its best to just add a specific ubuf alloc wrapper that
can't fail (i.e. like the 'xmalloc' wrappers).
Like Pablo said, I don't see any added value in providing FILE/LINE
errors on stderr here. It could be as simple as exit().
