On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:14:56PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 17:05 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: [...] > > I might end up myself using > > free_const() everywhere not to figure out if it is const or not, > > because I don't really care. > > That seems not a good practice. Const-correctness may help you to catch > bugs via unwanted modifications. If constness is unnecessarily cast > away, it's looses such hints from the compiler. Why should I care if the pointer is const or not if what I need to free it?
