Re: [PATCH nft 2/2] json: drop handling missing json() hook for "struct expr_ops"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 12:20:29PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> By now, all "struct expr_ops" have a json() hook set. Thus, drop
> handling the possibility that they might not. From now on, it's a bug
> to create a ops without the hook.
> 
> It's not clear what the code tried to do. It bothered to implement a
> fallback via fmemopen(), but apparently that fallback is no considered a
> good solution as it also printed a "warning". Either the fallback is
> good and does not warrant a warning. Or the condition is to be avoided
> to begin with, which we should do by testing the expr_ops structures.
> 
> As the fallback path has an overhead to create the memory stream, the
> fallback path is indeed not great. That is the reason to outlaw a
> missing json() hook, to require that all hooks are present, and to drop
> the fallback path.
> 
> A missing hook is very easy to cover with unit tests. Such a test shall
> be added soon.

That's fine to simplify code.

But then, in 1/2 you better set some STUB that hits BUG() because we
should not ever see variable and symbol expression from json listing
path ever.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux