On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 12:20:29PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > By now, all "struct expr_ops" have a json() hook set. Thus, drop > handling the possibility that they might not. From now on, it's a bug > to create a ops without the hook. > > It's not clear what the code tried to do. It bothered to implement a > fallback via fmemopen(), but apparently that fallback is no considered a > good solution as it also printed a "warning". Either the fallback is > good and does not warrant a warning. Or the condition is to be avoided > to begin with, which we should do by testing the expr_ops structures. > > As the fallback path has an overhead to create the memory stream, the > fallback path is indeed not great. That is the reason to outlaw a > missing json() hook, to require that all hooks are present, and to drop > the fallback path. > > A missing hook is very easy to cover with unit tests. Such a test shall > be added soon. That's fine to simplify code. But then, in 1/2 you better set some STUB that hits BUG() because we should not ever see variable and symbol expression from json listing path ever.