Re: [PATCH v13 08/12] landlock: Add network rules and TCP hooks support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





10/20/2023 12:49 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:08:33AM +0300, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:


10/18/2023 3:29 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 09:50:26AM +0800, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
> > This commit adds network rules support in the ruleset management
> > Here are some advices to better write commit messages:
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> The "Describe your changes in imperative mood" part is important for
> this commit and others. Most of this patch series' commit messages need
> small updates.

 Ok. I will refactor commit messages with "imperative mood". Thanks.
> > > helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset syscall.
> > Refactor user space API to support network actions. Add new network
> > access flags, network rule and network attributes. Increment Landlock
> > ABI version. Expand access_masks_t to u32 to be sure network access
> > Please explain the "why" (when it makes sense) instead of just listing
> the "what".

  Ok.

> > > rights can be stored. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect()
> > LSM hooks, which enables to restrict TCP socket binding and connection
> > to specific ports.
> > I reworded and moved this part in last:
> > For the file system, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data.
> > But for the network, it's impossible to identify for which data/peer a
> > newly created socket will give access to, it's needed to wait for a
> > connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket.
> > That's why the access rights (related to ports) are tied to an opened
> > socket, but this would not align with the way Landlock access control
> > works for the filesystem [2].

   Thanks.
> > Please add empty line to split paragraphs.

  Got it.
> > > The new landlock_net_port_attr structure has two fields. The allowed_access
> > field contains the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_* rights. The port field contains
> > the port value according to the allowed protocol. This field can
> > take up to a 64-bit value [1] but the maximum value depends on the related
> > protocol (e.g. 16-bit for TCP).
> > For the file system, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data.
> However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly
> created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or
> bind request to identify the use case for this socket.
> > Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors. Instead, bind and
> connect actions are controlled by the task's domain.  As for the filesystem, a
> directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data
> item), but this opening is restricted by the task's domain, not the file
> descriptor's access rights [2].
> > > > > [1]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [2]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@xxxxxxxxxxx
  Thanks.
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920092641.832134-9-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx
> > [mic: Remove !ARCH_EPHEMERAL_INODES in Kconfig, and add landlock_ prefix
> > to add_rule_net_service()]
> > Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > > > Changes since v12:
> > * Moves add_rule_net_port() back in syscalls.c and makes it static.
> > * Deletes bind_access_mask allowing bind action rule on port 0.
> > * Adds comment about port 0 in landlock_net_port_attr structure.
> > * Removes !ARCH_EPHEMERAL_INODES from Kconfig.
> > * Minor fixes.
> > * Refactors commit message.
> > > > Changes since v11:
> > * Replaces dates with "2022-2023" in net.c/h files headers.
> > * Removes WARN_ON_ONCE(!domain) in check_socket_access().
> > * Using "typeof(*address)" instead of offsetofend(struct sockaddr, sa_family).
> > * Renames LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE to LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT.
> > * Renames landlock_net_service_attr to landlock_net_port_attr.
> > * Defines two add_rule_net_service() functions according to
> >   IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) instead of changing the body of the only
> >   function.
> > * Adds af_family consistency check while handling AF_UNSPEC specifically.
> > * Adds bind_access_mask in add_rule_net_service() to deny all rules with bind
> >   action on port zero.
> > * Minor fixes.
> > * Refactors commit message.
> > > > Changes since v10:
> > * Removes "packed" attribute.
> > * Applies Mickaёl's patch with some refactoring.
> > * Deletes get_port() and check_addrlen() helpers.
> > * Refactors check_socket_access() by squashing get_port() and
> >   check_addrlen() helpers into it.
> > * Fixes commit message.
> > > > Changes since v9:
> > * Changes UAPI port field to __u64.
> > * Moves shared code into check_socket_access().
> > * Adds get_raw_handled_net_accesses() and
> >   get_current_net_domain() helpers.
> > * Minor fixes.
> > > > Changes since v8:
> > * Squashes commits.
> > * Refactors commit message.
> > * Changes UAPI port field to __be16.
> > * Changes logic of bind/connect hooks with AF_UNSPEC families.
> > * Adds address length checking.
> > * Minor fixes.
> > > > Changes since v7:
> > * Squashes commits.
> > * Increments ABI version to 4.
> > * Refactors commit message.
> > * Minor fixes.
> > > > Changes since v6:
> > * Renames landlock_set_net_access_mask() to landlock_add_net_access_mask()
> >   because it OR values.
> > * Makes landlock_add_net_access_mask() more resilient incorrect values.
> > * Refactors landlock_get_net_access_mask().
> > * Renames LANDLOCK_MASK_SHIFT_NET to LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_NET and use
> >   LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS as value.
> > * Updates access_masks_t to u32 to support network access actions.
> > * Refactors landlock internal functions to support network actions with
> >   landlock_key/key_type/id types.
> > > > Changes since v5:
> > * Gets rid of partial revert from landlock_add_rule
> > syscall.
> > * Formats code with clang-format-14.
> > > > Changes since v4:
> > * Refactors landlock_create_ruleset() - splits ruleset and
> > masks checks.
> > * Refactors landlock_create_ruleset() and landlock mask
> > setters/getters to support two rule types.
> > * Refactors landlock_add_rule syscall add_rule_path_beneath
> > function by factoring out get_ruleset_from_fd() and
> > landlock_put_ruleset().
> > > > Changes since v3:
> > * Splits commit.
> > * Adds network rule support for internal landlock functions.
> > * Adds set_mask and get_mask for network.
> > * Adds rb_root root_net_port.
> > > > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/landlock.h                |  56 ++++++
> >  security/landlock/Kconfig                    |   1 +
> >  security/landlock/Makefile                   |   2 +
> >  security/landlock/limits.h                   |   5 +
> >  security/landlock/net.c                      | 198 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  security/landlock/net.h                      |  33 ++++
> >  security/landlock/ruleset.c                  |  62 +++++-
> >  security/landlock/ruleset.h                  |  59 +++++-
> >  security/landlock/setup.c                    |   2 +
> >  security/landlock/syscalls.c                 |  69 ++++++-
> >  tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c |   2 +-
> >  11 files changed, 466 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 security/landlock/net.c
> >  create mode 100644 security/landlock/net.h
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> > index 81d09ef9aa50..25349666b19e 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> > @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ struct landlock_ruleset_attr {
> >  	 * this access right.
> >  	 */
> >  	__u64 handled_access_fs;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @handled_access_net: Bitmask of actions (cf. `Network flags`_)
> > +	 * that is handled by this ruleset and should then be forbidden if no
> > +	 * rule explicitly allow them.
> > +	 */
> > +	__u64 handled_access_net;
> >  };
> > > > /*
> > @@ -54,6 +60,11 @@ enum landlock_rule_type {
> >  	 * landlock_path_beneath_attr .
> >  	 */
> >  	LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH = 1,
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT: Type of a &struct
> > +	 * landlock_net_port_attr .
> > +	 */
> > +	LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT = 2,
> > We don't need the explicit " = 2".

  Fixed. Thanks.
> > > }; > > > > /**
> > @@ -79,6 +90,32 @@ struct landlock_path_beneath_attr {
> >  	 */
> >  } __attribute__((packed));
> > > > +/**
> > + * struct landlock_net_port_attr - Network port definition
> > + *
> > + * Argument of sys_landlock_add_rule().
> > + */
> > +struct landlock_net_port_attr {
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @allowed_access: Bitmask of allowed access network for a port
> > +	 * (cf. `Network flags`_).
> > +	 */
> > +	__u64 allowed_access;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @port: Network port. Landlock does not forbid rules with port 0,
> > +	 * since some network services use it. Port 0 is a reserved one in
> > +	 * TCP/IP networking, meaning that it should not be used in TCP or
> > +	 * UDP messages. To allocate its source port number, services call
> > +	 * TCP/IP network functions like bind() to request one. With port 0
> > +	 * it triggers the operating system to automatically search for
> > +	 * and return a suitable available port in the TCP/IP dynamic
> > +	 * port number range. This port range can be controlled by a
> > +	 * sysadmin with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range sysctl,
> > +	 * which is also used by IPv6.
> > This looks too inspired from
> https://www.lifewire.com/port-0-in-tcp-and-udp-818145

  Yep. You are right.
> > Let's make it simpler: > > * @port: Network port.
>   *
>   * It should be noted that port 0 passed to :manpage:`bind(2)` will
>   * bind to an available port from a specific port range. This can be
>   * configured thanks to the ``/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range``
>   * sysctl (also used for IPv6). A Landlock rule with port 0 and the
>   * ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP`` right means that requesting to bind
>   * on port 0 is allowed and it will automatically translate to binding
>   * on the related port range.
    Thanks.
> > > + */
> > +	__u64 port;
> > +};
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * DOC: fs_access
> >   *
> > @@ -189,4 +226,23 @@ struct landlock_path_beneath_attr {
> >  #define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE			(1ULL << 14)
> >  /* clang-format on */
> > > > +/**
> > + * DOC: net_access
> > + *
> > + * Network flags
> > + * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > + *
> > + * These flags enable to restrict a sandboxed process to a set of network
> > + * actions.
> > You can add:
> "This is supported since ABI 4."

   Updated.
> > > + *
> > + * TCP sockets with allowed actions:
> > + *
> > + * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP: Bind a TCP socket to a local port.
> > + * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP: Connect an active TCP socket to
> > + *   a remote port.
> > + */
> > +/* clang-format off */
> > +#define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP			(1ULL << 0)
> > +#define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP			(1ULL << 1)
> > +/* clang-format on */
> >  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_LANDLOCK_H */
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/Kconfig b/security/landlock/Kconfig
> > index c1e862a38410..c4bf0d5eff39 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/Kconfig
> > +++ b/security/landlock/Kconfig
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >  config SECURITY_LANDLOCK
> >  	bool "Landlock support"
> >  	depends on SECURITY
> > +	select SECURITY_NETWORK
> >  	select SECURITY_PATH
> >  	help
> >  	  Landlock is a sandboxing mechanism that enables processes to restrict
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/Makefile b/security/landlock/Makefile
> > index 7bbd2f413b3e..53d3c92ae22e 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/Makefile
> > +++ b/security/landlock/Makefile
> > @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK) := landlock.o
> > > > landlock-y := setup.o syscalls.o object.o ruleset.o \
> >  	cred.o ptrace.o fs.o
> > +
> > +landlock-$(CONFIG_INET) += net.o
> > \ No newline at end of file
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/limits.h b/security/landlock/limits.h
> > index bafb3b8dc677..93c9c6f91556 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/limits.h
> > +++ b/security/landlock/limits.h
> > @@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
> >  #define LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS		__const_hweight64(LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS)
> >  #define LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_FS	0
> > > > +#define LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP
> > +#define LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET	((LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET << 1) - 1)
> > +#define LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET		__const_hweight64(LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET)
> > +#define LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_NET	LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS
> > +
> >  /* clang-format on */
> > > > #endif /* _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LIMITS_H */
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..1bf26cf3c41b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/landlock/net.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * Landlock LSM - Network management and hooks
> > + *
> > + * Copyright © 2022-2023 Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd.
> > + * Copyright © 2022-2023 Microsoft Corporation
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/in.h>
> > +#include <linux/net.h>
> > +#include <linux/socket.h>
> > +#include <net/ipv6.h>
> > +
> > +#include "common.h"
> > +#include "cred.h"
> > +#include "limits.h"
> > +#include "net.h"
> > +#include "ruleset.h"
> > +
> > +int landlock_append_net_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> > +			     const u16 port, access_mask_t access_rights)
> > +{
> > +	int err;
> > +	const struct landlock_id id = {
> > +		.key.data = (__force uintptr_t)htons(port),
> > +		.type = LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));
> > +
> > +	/* Transforms relative access rights to absolute ones. */
> > +	access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET &
> > +			 ~landlock_get_net_access_mask(ruleset, 0);
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&ruleset->lock);
> > +	err = landlock_insert_rule(ruleset, id, access_rights);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&ruleset->lock);
> > +
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static access_mask_t
> > +get_raw_handled_net_accesses(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain)
> > +{
> > +	access_mask_t access_dom = 0;
> > +	size_t layer_level;
> > +
> > +	for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++)
> > +		access_dom |= landlock_get_net_access_mask(domain, layer_level);
> > +	return access_dom;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct landlock_ruleset *get_current_net_domain(void)
> > +{
> > +	const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom =
> > +		landlock_get_current_domain();
> > +
> > +	if (!dom || !get_raw_handled_net_accesses(dom))
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	return dom;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int check_socket_access(struct socket *const sock,
> > To be consistent with current_check_access_path(), please rename to
> current_check_access_socket().

  Done. Thanks.
> > > + struct sockaddr *const address,
> > +			       const int addrlen,
> > +			       const access_mask_t access_request)
> > +{
> > +	__be16 port;
> > +	layer_mask_t layer_masks[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET] = {};
> > +	const struct landlock_rule *rule;
> > +	access_mask_t handled_access;
> > +	struct landlock_id id = {
> > +		.type = LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
> > +	};
> > +	const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain = get_current_net_domain();
> > For consistency with other functions, s/domain/dom/g

 Ok. Fixed.
> > > +
> > +	if (!domain)
> > +		return 0;
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(domain->num_layers < 1))
> > +		return -EACCES;
> > +
> > +	/* Checks if it's a (potential) TCP socket. */
> > +	if (sock->type != SOCK_STREAM)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/* Checks for minimal header length to safely read sa_family. */
> > +	if (addrlen < offsetofend(typeof(*address), sa_family))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	switch (address->sa_family) {
> > +	case AF_UNSPEC:
> > +	case AF_INET:
> > +		if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		port = ((struct sockaddr_in *)address)->sin_port;
> > +		break;
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> > +	case AF_INET6:
> > +		if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		port = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)address)->sin6_port;
> > +		break;
> > +#endif
> > #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */

  #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */ I suppose.

Indeed

> > > + default:
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Specific AF_UNSPEC handling. */
> > +	if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves the TCP
> > +		 * association, which have the same effect as closing the
> > +		 * connection while retaining the socket object (i.e., the file
> > +		 * descriptor).  As for dropping privileges, closing
> > +		 * connections is always allowed.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * For a TCP access control system, this request is legitimate.
> > +		 * Let the network stack handle potential inconsistencies and
> > +		 * return -EINVAL if needed.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP)
> > +			return 0;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For compatibility reason, accept AF_UNSPEC for bind
> > +		 * accesses (mapped to AF_INET) only if the address is
> > +		 * INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind).  Checking the address is
> > +		 * required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of
> > +		 * -EAFNOSUPPORT.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle these
> > +		 * checks, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
> > +		 * consistency thanks to kselftest.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP) {
> > +			/* addrlen has already been checked for AF_UNSPEC. */
> > +			const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
> > +				(struct sockaddr_in *)address;
> > +
> > +			if (sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family != AF_INET)
> > +				return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +			if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY))
> > +				return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> > +		}
> > +	} else {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
> > +		 * -EACCES instead of -EINVAL.  Valid sa_family changes are
> > +		 * only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
> > +		 * check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
> > +		 * consistency thanks to kselftest.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (address->sa_family != sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	id.key.data = (__force uintptr_t)port;
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));
> > +
> > +	rule = landlock_find_rule(domain, id);
> > +	handled_access = landlock_init_layer_masks(
> > +		domain, access_request, &layer_masks, LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
> > +	if (landlock_unmask_layers(rule, handled_access, &layer_masks,
> > +				   ARRAY_SIZE(layer_masks)))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return -EACCES;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *const sock,
> > +			    struct sockaddr *const address, const int addrlen)
> > +{
> > +	return check_socket_access(sock, address, addrlen,
> > +				   LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int hook_socket_connect(struct socket *const sock,
> > +			       struct sockaddr *const address,
> > +			       const int addrlen)
> > +{
> > +	return check_socket_access(sock, address, addrlen,
> > +				   LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> > +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_bind, hook_socket_bind),
> > +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_connect, hook_socket_connect),
> > +};
> > +
> > +__init void landlock_add_net_hooks(void)
> > +{
> > +	security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks),
> > +			   LANDLOCK_NAME);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/net.h b/security/landlock/net.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..588a49fd6907
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/landlock/net.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +/*
> > + * Landlock LSM - Network management and hooks
> > + *
> > + * Copyright © 2022-2023 Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_NET_H
> > +#define _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_NET_H
> > +
> > +#include "common.h"
> > +#include "ruleset.h"
> > +#include "setup.h"
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +__init void landlock_add_net_hooks(void);
> > +
> > +int landlock_append_net_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> > +			     const u16 port, access_mask_t access_rights);
> > +#else /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +static inline void landlock_add_net_hooks(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int
> > +landlock_append_net_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset, const u16 port,
> > +			 access_mask_t access_rights);
> > +{
> > +	return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> > +#endif /* _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_NET_H */
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> > index 4c209acee01e..1fe4298ff4a7 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> > +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
> >  	refcount_set(&new_ruleset->usage, 1);
> >  	mutex_init(&new_ruleset->lock);
> >  	new_ruleset->root_inode = RB_ROOT;
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +	new_ruleset->root_net_port = RB_ROOT;
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> >  	new_ruleset->num_layers = num_layers;
> >  	/*
> >  	 * hierarchy = NULL
> > @@ -46,16 +51,21 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
> >  }
> > > > struct landlock_ruleset *
> > -landlock_create_ruleset(const access_mask_t fs_access_mask)
> > +landlock_create_ruleset(const access_mask_t fs_access_mask,
> > +			const access_mask_t net_access_mask)
> >  {
> >  	struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset;
> > > > /* Informs about useless ruleset. */
> > -	if (!fs_access_mask)
> > +	if (!fs_access_mask && !net_access_mask)
> >  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMSG);
> >  	new_ruleset = create_ruleset(1);
> > -	if (!IS_ERR(new_ruleset))
> > +	if (IS_ERR(new_ruleset))
> > +		return new_ruleset;
> > +	if (fs_access_mask)
> >  		landlock_add_fs_access_mask(new_ruleset, fs_access_mask, 0);
> > +	if (net_access_mask)
> > +		landlock_add_net_access_mask(new_ruleset, net_access_mask, 0);
> > This is good, but it is not tested: we need to add a test that both
> handle FS and net restrictions. You can add one in net.c, just handling
> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP, add one
> rule with path_beneath (e.g. /dev) and another with net_port, and check
> that open("/") is denied, open("/dev") is allowed, and and only the
> allowed port is allowed with bind(). This test should be simple and can
> only check against an IPv4 socket, i.e. using ipv4_tcp fixture, just
> after port_endianness. fcntl.h should then be included by net.c

  Ok.
> > I guess that was the purpose of layout1.with_net (in fs_test.c) but it

  Yep. I added this kind of nest in fs_test.c to test both fs and network
rules together.
> is not complete. You can revamp this test and move it to net.c
> following the above suggestions, keeping it consistent with other tests
> in net.c . You don't need the test_open() nor create_ruleset() helpers.
> > This test must failed if we change "ruleset->access_masks[layer_level] |="
> to "ruleset->access_masks[layer_level] =" in
> landlock_add_fs_access_mask() or landlock_add_net_access_mask().

  Do you want to change it? Why?

The kernel code is correct and must not be changed. However, if by
mistake we change it and remove the OR, a test should catch that. We
need a test to assert this assumption.

  Fs and network masks are ORed to not intersect with each other.

Yes, they are ORed, and we need a test to check that. Noting is
currently testing this OR (and the different rule type consistency).
I'm suggesting to revamp the layout1.with_net test into
ipv4_tcp.with_fs and make it check ruleset->access_masks[] and rule
addition of different types.

Thinking about this test. We don't need to add any additional ASSERT here. Anyway if we accidentally change "ruleset->access_masks[layer_level] |=" to "ruleset->access_masks[layer_level] =" we will fail either in opening directory or in port binding, cause adding a second rule (fs or net) will overwrite a first one's mask. it does not matter which one goes first. I will check it and send you a message.
What do you think?


> > > return new_ruleset;
> >  }
> > > > @@ -74,6 +84,11 @@ static bool is_object_pointer(const enum landlock_key_type key_type)
> >  	case LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE:
> >  		return true;
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +	case LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT:
> > +		return false;
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> >  	default:
> >  		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> >  		return false;
> > @@ -126,7 +141,13 @@ static struct rb_root *get_root(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >  	case LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE:
> >  		return &ruleset->root_inode;
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +	case LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT:
> > +		return &ruleset->root_net_port;
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> >  	default:
> > +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > Please move this WARN to the patch that added the previous and next
> lines.

  OK. Will be moved.
> > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >  	}
> >  }
> > @@ -153,7 +174,8 @@ static void build_check_ruleset(void)
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_rules < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_RULES);
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_layers < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS);
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(access_masks <
> > -		     (LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS << LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_FS));
> > +		     ((LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS << LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_FS) |
> > +		      (LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET << LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_NET)));
> >  }
> > > > /**
> > @@ -370,6 +392,13 @@ static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
> >  	if (err)
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +	/* Merges the @src network port tree. */
> > +	err = merge_tree(dst, src, LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> >  out_unlock:
> >  	mutex_unlock(&src->lock);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&dst->lock);
> > @@ -426,6 +455,13 @@ static int inherit_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
> >  	if (err)
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +	/* Copies the @parent network port tree. */
> > +	err = inherit_tree(parent, child, LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> >  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(child->num_layers <= parent->num_layers)) {
> >  		err = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> > @@ -455,6 +491,13 @@ static void free_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset)
> >  	rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(freeme, next, &ruleset->root_inode,
> >  					     node)
> >  		free_rule(freeme, LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE);
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +	rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(freeme, next,
> > +					     &ruleset->root_net_port, node)
> > +		free_rule(freeme, LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> >  	put_hierarchy(ruleset->hierarchy);
> >  	kfree(ruleset);
> >  }
> > @@ -635,7 +678,8 @@ get_access_mask_t(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >   *
> >   * @domain: The domain that defines the current restrictions.
> >   * @access_request: The requested access rights to check.
> > - * @layer_masks: The layer masks to populate.
> > + * @layer_masks: It must contain LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS or LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET
> > "%LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS or %LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET"

  Done.
> > > + * elements according to @key_type.
> >   * @key_type: The key type to switch between access masks of different types.
> >   *
> >   * Returns: An access mask where each access right bit is set which is handled
> > @@ -656,6 +700,14 @@ landlock_init_layer_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> >  		get_access_mask = landlock_get_fs_access_mask;
> >  		num_access = LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS;
> >  		break;
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> > +	case LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT:
> > +		get_access_mask = landlock_get_net_access_mask;
> > +		num_access = LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET;
> > +		break;
> > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */
> > +
> >  	default:
> >  		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> >  		return 0;
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> > index 1ede2b9a79b7..ba4a06035599 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> > +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> > @@ -33,13 +33,16 @@
> >  typedef u16 access_mask_t;
> >  /* Makes sure all filesystem access rights can be stored. */
> >  static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(access_mask_t) >= LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS);
> > +/* Makes sure all network access rights can be stored. */
> > +static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(access_mask_t) >= LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET);
> >  /* Makes sure for_each_set_bit() and for_each_clear_bit() calls are OK. */
> >  static_assert(sizeof(unsigned long) >= sizeof(access_mask_t));
> > > > /* Ruleset access masks. */
> > -typedef u16 access_masks_t;
> > +typedef u32 access_masks_t;
> >  /* Makes sure all ruleset access rights can be stored. */
> > -static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(access_masks_t) >= LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS);
> > +static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(access_masks_t) >=
> > +	      LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS + LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET);
> > > > typedef u16 layer_mask_t;
> >  /* Makes sure all layers can be checked. */
> > @@ -84,6 +87,11 @@ enum landlock_key_type {
> >  	 * keys.
> >  	 */
> >  	LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE = 1,
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT: Type of &landlock_ruleset.root_net_port's
> > +	 * node keys.
> > +	 */
> > +	LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
> >  };
> > > > /**
> > @@ -158,6 +166,13 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
> >  	 * reaches zero.
> >  	 */
> >  	struct rb_root root_inode;
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
  OK. Done.
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @root_net_port: Root of a red-black tree containing &struct
> > +	 * landlock_rule nodes with network port. Once a ruleset is tied to a
> > +	 * process (i.e. as a domain), this tree is immutable until @usage
> > +	 * reaches zero.
> > +	 */
> > +	struct rb_root root_net_port;
> > #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) */

 Done.
> > > /**
> >  	 * @hierarchy: Enables hierarchy identification even when a parent
> >  	 * domain vanishes.  This is needed for the ptrace protection.
> > @@ -196,13 +211,13 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
> >  			 */
> >  			u32 num_layers;
> >  			/**
> > -			 * @access_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem
> > -			 * actions that are restricted by a ruleset.  A domain
> > -			 * saves all layers of merged rulesets in a stack
> > -			 * (FAM), starting from the first layer to the last
> > -			 * one.  These layers are used when merging rulesets,
> > -			 * for user space backward compatibility (i.e.
> > -			 * future-proof), and to properly handle merged
> > +			 * @access_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem and
> > +			 * network actions that are restricted by a ruleset.
> > +			 * A domain saves all layers of merged rulesets in a
> > +			 * stack (FAM), starting from the first layer to the
> > +			 * last one.  These layers are used when merging
> > +			 * rulesets, for user space backward compatibility
> > +			 * (i.e. future-proof), and to properly handle merged
> >  			 * rulesets without overlapping access rights.  These
> >  			 * layers are set once and never changed for the
> >  			 * lifetime of the ruleset.
> > @@ -213,7 +228,8 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
> >  };
> > > > struct landlock_ruleset *
> > -landlock_create_ruleset(const access_mask_t access_mask);
> > +landlock_create_ruleset(const access_mask_t access_mask_fs,
> > +			const access_mask_t access_mask_net);
> > > > void landlock_put_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset);
> >  void landlock_put_ruleset_deferred(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset);
> > @@ -249,6 +265,19 @@ landlock_add_fs_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >  		(fs_mask << LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_FS);
> >  }
> > > > +static inline void
> > +landlock_add_net_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> > +			     const access_mask_t net_access_mask,
> > +			     const u16 layer_level)
> > +{
> > +	access_mask_t net_mask = net_access_mask & LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET;
> > +
> > +	/* Should already be checked in sys_landlock_create_ruleset(). */
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(net_access_mask != net_mask);
> > +	ruleset->access_masks[layer_level] |=
> > +		(net_mask << LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_NET);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline access_mask_t
> >  landlock_get_raw_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >  				const u16 layer_level)
> > @@ -266,6 +295,16 @@ landlock_get_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >  	return landlock_get_raw_fs_access_mask(ruleset, layer_level) |
> >  	       LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static inline access_mask_t
> > +landlock_get_net_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> > +			     const u16 layer_level)
> > +{
> > +	return (ruleset->access_masks[layer_level] >>
> > +		LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_NET) &
> > +	       LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET;
> > +}
> > +
> >  bool landlock_unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
> >  			    const access_mask_t access_request,
> >  			    layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[],
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/setup.c b/security/landlock/setup.c
> > index 0f6113528fa4..df81612811bf 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/setup.c
> > +++ b/security/landlock/setup.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  #include "fs.h"
> >  #include "ptrace.h"
> >  #include "setup.h"
> > +#include "net.h"
> > > > bool landlock_initialized __ro_after_init = false; > > > > @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ static int __init landlock_init(void)
> >  	landlock_add_cred_hooks();
> >  	landlock_add_ptrace_hooks();
> >  	landlock_add_fs_hooks();
> > +	landlock_add_net_hooks();
> >  	landlock_initialized = true;
> >  	pr_info("Up and running.\n");
> >  	return 0;
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/syscalls.c b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
> > index 8a54e87dbb17..3ad652d9a146 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/syscalls.c
> > +++ b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >  #include "cred.h"
> >  #include "fs.h"
> >  #include "limits.h"
> > +#include "net.h"
> >  #include "ruleset.h"
> >  #include "setup.h"
> > > > @@ -74,7 +75,8 @@ static void build_check_abi(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr;
> >  	struct landlock_path_beneath_attr path_beneath_attr;
> > -	size_t ruleset_size, path_beneath_size;
> > +	struct landlock_net_port_attr net_port_attr;
> > +	size_t ruleset_size, path_beneath_size, net_port_size;
> > > > /*
> >  	 * For each user space ABI structures, first checks that there is no
> > @@ -82,13 +84,19 @@ static void build_check_abi(void)
> >  	 * struct size.
> >  	 */
> >  	ruleset_size = sizeof(ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs);
> > +	ruleset_size += sizeof(ruleset_attr.handled_access_net);
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ruleset_attr) != ruleset_size);
> > -	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ruleset_attr) != 8);
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ruleset_attr) != 16);
> > > > path_beneath_size = sizeof(path_beneath_attr.allowed_access);
> >  	path_beneath_size += sizeof(path_beneath_attr.parent_fd);
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(path_beneath_attr) != path_beneath_size);
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(path_beneath_attr) != 12);
> > +
> > +	net_port_size = sizeof(net_port_attr.allowed_access);
> > +	net_port_size += sizeof(net_port_attr.port);
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(net_port_attr) != net_port_size);
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(net_port_attr) != 16);
> >  }
> > > > /* Ruleset handling */
> > @@ -129,7 +137,7 @@ static const struct file_operations ruleset_fops = {
> >  	.write = fop_dummy_write,
> >  };
> > > > -#define LANDLOCK_ABI_VERSION 3
> > +#define LANDLOCK_ABI_VERSION 4
> > > > /**
> >   * sys_landlock_create_ruleset - Create a new ruleset
> > @@ -188,8 +196,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(landlock_create_ruleset,
> >  	    LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > > + /* Checks network content (and 32-bits cast). */
> > +	if ((ruleset_attr.handled_access_net | LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET) !=
> > +	    LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >  	/* Checks arguments and transforms to kernel struct. */
> > -	ruleset = landlock_create_ruleset(ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs);
> > +	ruleset = landlock_create_ruleset(ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs,
> > +					  ruleset_attr.handled_access_net);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(ruleset))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(ruleset);
> > > > @@ -282,7 +296,7 @@ static int add_rule_path_beneath(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >  	int res, err;
> >  	access_mask_t mask;
> > > > - /* Copies raw user space buffer, only one type for now. */
> > +	/* Copies raw user space buffer. */
> > Shouldn't this be part of a previous patch?

I did it according Gunter's suggestion
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230627.82cde73b1efe@xxxxxxxxxx/

Ok, that indeed makes more sense in this patch, please keep it.

> > > res = copy_from_user(&path_beneath_attr, rule_attr,
> >  			     sizeof(path_beneath_attr));
> >  	if (res)
> > @@ -315,13 +329,49 @@ static int add_rule_path_beneath(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> > > > +static int add_rule_net_port(struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset,
> > +			     const void __user *const rule_attr)
> > +{
> > +	struct landlock_net_port_attr net_port_attr;
> > +	int res;
> > +	access_mask_t mask;
> > +
> > +	/* Copies raw user space buffer. */
> > +	res = copy_from_user(&net_port_attr, rule_attr, sizeof(net_port_attr));
> > +	if (res)
> > +		return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Informs about useless rule: empty allowed_access (i.e. deny rules)
> > +	 * are ignored by network actions.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!net_port_attr.allowed_access)
> > +		return -ENOMSG;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Checks that allowed_access matches the @ruleset constraints
> > +	 * (ruleset->access_masks[0] is automatically upgraded to 64-bits).
> > +	 */
> > +	mask = landlock_get_net_access_mask(ruleset, 0);
> > +	if ((net_port_attr.allowed_access | mask) != mask)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* Denies inserting a rule with port higher than 65535. */
> > For consistency with the following comment:
> "Denies inserting a rule with port greater than 65535."
> Done. Thanks. > > > + if (net_port_attr.port > U16_MAX)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* Imports the new rule. */
> > +	return landlock_append_net_rule(ruleset, net_port_attr.port,
> > +					net_port_attr.allowed_access);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * sys_landlock_add_rule - Add a new rule to a ruleset
> >   *
> >   * @ruleset_fd: File descriptor tied to the ruleset that should be extended
> >   *		with the new rule.
> > - * @rule_type: Identify the structure type pointed to by @rule_attr (only
> > - *             %LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH for now).
> > + * @rule_type: Identify the structure type pointed to by @rule_attr:
> > + *             %LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH or %LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT.
> >   * @rule_attr: Pointer to a rule (only of type &struct
> >   *             landlock_path_beneath_attr for now).
> >   * @flags: Must be 0.
> > @@ -332,6 +382,8 @@ static int add_rule_path_beneath(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> >   * Possible returned errors are:
> >   *
> >   * - %EOPNOTSUPP: Landlock is supported by the kernel but disabled at boot time;
> > + * - %EAFNOSUPPORT: @rule_type is LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT but TCP/IP is not
> > %LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT

 Done.
> > > + * supported by the running kernel;
> >   * - %EINVAL: @flags is not 0, or inconsistent access in the rule (i.e.
> >   *   &landlock_path_beneath_attr.allowed_access is not a subset of the
> > &landlock_path_beneath_attr.allowed_access or
> &landlock_net_port_attr.allowed_access is not a subset of the

  Fixed. Thanks.
> > > * ruleset handled accesses); > > EINVAL description needs to be updated, especially for port > U16_MAX:
> - *   ruleset handled accesses);
> + *   ruleset handled accesses), or &landlock_net_port_attr.port is
> +     greater than 65535;

 Done. Thanks.
> > > > @@ -366,6 +418,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(landlock_add_rule, const int, ruleset_fd,
> >  	case LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH:
> >  		err = add_rule_path_beneath(ruleset, rule_attr);
> >  		break;
> > +	case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT:
> > +		err = add_rule_net_port(ruleset, rule_attr);
> > +		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		err = -EINVAL;
> >  		break;
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> > index 792c3f0a59b4..646f778dfb1e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ TEST(abi_version)
> >  	const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> >  		.handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
> >  	};
> > -	ASSERT_EQ(3, landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0,
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(4, landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0,
> >  					     LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION));
> > > > ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, 0,
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> > > .
.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux