[PATCH nf-next 4/6] netfilter: nf_nat: mask out non-verdict bits when checking return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Same as previous change: we need to mask out the non-verdict bits, as
upcoming patches may embed an errno value in NF_STOLEN verdicts too.

NF_DROP could already do this, but not all called functions do this.

Checks that only test ret vs NF_ACCEPT are fine, the 'errno parts'
are always 0 for those.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
index 5a049740758f..6d969468c779 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
@@ -999,11 +999,12 @@ static unsigned int
 nf_nat_ipv6_in(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	       const struct nf_hook_state *state)
 {
-	unsigned int ret;
+	unsigned int ret, verdict;
 	struct in6_addr daddr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr;
 
 	ret = nf_nat_ipv6_fn(priv, skb, state);
-	if (ret != NF_DROP && ret != NF_STOLEN &&
+	verdict = ret & NF_VERDICT_MASK;
+	if (verdict != NF_DROP && verdict != NF_STOLEN &&
 	    ipv6_addr_cmp(&daddr, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))
 		skb_dst_drop(skb);
 
-- 
2.41.0




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux