Re: [RFC] nftables 1.0.6 -stable backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 01:15:43PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 10/9/23 12:44, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > - Another possibility is to make a nftables or 1.0.6a -stable
> > > release from did not follow this procedure
> > > very often (a few cases in the past in iptables IIRC).
> > 
> > Given the amount of patches, this would be the preferred method from the
> > Debian point of view.
> > 
> > as version should be fine.

Only one thing: I just wonder if this new 4 numbers scheme might
create confusion, as there will be release with 3 numbers and -stable
releases with 4 numbers.

> In that case the only question is if we add 1.0.6.y branch to
> nftables.git or create nftables-stable.git.
> I'd go with stable branches directly in nftables.git, but would
> not mind a separate repo either.

Fine with me, separated branch is fine.

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux