Re: [PATCH nft 2/3] nfnl_osf: rework nf_osf_parse_opt() and avoid "-Wstrict-overflow" warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 19:11 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 07:04:57PM +0200, Thomas Haller wrote:
> > 
> > How can pf.os used?
> 
> According to code, pf.os file with signatures needs to be placed
> here:
> 
> #define OS_SIGNATURES DEFAULT_INCLUDE_PATH "/nftables/osf/pf.os"
> 
> then, you can start matching on OS type, see 'osf' expression in
> manpage. Note there is a "unknown" OS type when it does not guess the
> OS.


Sorry, I don't follow. Testing this seems very cumbersome.

I suspect, the tests "tests/shell/testcases/sets/typeof_{sets,maps}_0"
might hit the code. But that test requires kernel support.

IMO the netfilter projects should require contributors to provide tests
(as sensible). That is, tests that are simply invoked via `make check`
and don't require to build special features in the kernel
(CONFIG_NFT_OSF).

Anyway. Let's hold this patch [2/3] back for now. And patch [1/3] is
obsolete too.

I have patches that would add unit tests to the project (merely as a
place where more unit tests could be added). I will add a test there.
But that is based on top of "no recursive make", and I'd like to get
that changed first.


Thomas





[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux