Wrap datatype compatibility check into a helper function and use it for
map evaluation, otherwise the following bogus error message is
displayed:
Error: datatype mismatch, map expects packet mark, mapping expression has type integer
Add unit tests to improve coverage for this usecase.
Fixes: 5d8e33ddb112 ("evaluate: relax type-checking for integer arguments in mark statements")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: unbreak datatype check.
src/evaluate.c | 17 +++++----
.../maps/dumps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0.nft | 26 +++++++++++++
.../shell/testcases/maps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0 | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/shell/testcases/maps/dumps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0.nft
create mode 100755 tests/shell/testcases/maps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0
diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index a537dcfd52b3..03586922848a 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -1882,6 +1882,13 @@ static int mapping_expr_expand(struct eval_ctx *ctx)
return 0;
}
+static bool datatype_compatible(const struct datatype *a, const struct datatype *b)
+{
+ return (a->type == TYPE_MARK &&
+ datatype_equal(datatype_basetype(a), datatype_basetype(b))) ||
+ datatype_equal(a, b);
+}
+
static int expr_evaluate_map(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr **expr)
{
struct expr *map = *expr, *mappings;
@@ -1989,7 +1996,7 @@ static int expr_evaluate_map(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr **expr)
expr_name(map->mappings));
}
- if (!datatype_equal(map->map->dtype, map->mappings->set->key->dtype))
+ if (!datatype_compatible(map->mappings->set->key->dtype, map->map->dtype))
return expr_binary_error(ctx->msgs, map->mappings, map->map,
"datatype mismatch, map expects %s, "
"mapping expression has type %s",
@@ -2823,11 +2830,7 @@ static int __stmt_evaluate_arg(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct stmt *stmt,
dtype->desc, (*expr)->dtype->desc,
(*expr)->len);
- if ((dtype->type == TYPE_MARK &&
- !datatype_equal(datatype_basetype(dtype), datatype_basetype((*expr)->dtype))) ||
- (dtype->type != TYPE_MARK &&
- (*expr)->dtype->type != TYPE_INTEGER &&
- !datatype_equal((*expr)->dtype, dtype)))
+ if (!datatype_compatible(dtype, (*expr)->dtype))
return stmt_binary_error(ctx, *expr, stmt, /* verdict vs invalid? */
"datatype mismatch: expected %s, "
"expression has type %s",
@@ -4385,7 +4388,7 @@ static int stmt_evaluate_objref_map(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct stmt *stmt)
expr_name(map->mappings));
}
- if (!datatype_equal(map->map->dtype, map->mappings->set->key->dtype))
+ if (!datatype_compatible(map->mappings->set->key->dtype, map->map->dtype))
return expr_binary_error(ctx->msgs, map->mappings, map->map,
"datatype mismatch, map expects %s, "
"mapping expression has type %s",
diff --git a/tests/shell/testcases/maps/dumps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0.nft b/tests/shell/testcases/maps/dumps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0.nft
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..beb5ffb098f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/shell/testcases/maps/dumps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0.nft
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+table ip x {
+ counter c_o0_0 {
+ packets 0 bytes 0
+ }
+
+ map sctm_o0 {
+ type mark : verdict
+ elements = { 0x00000000 : jump sctm_o0_0, 0x00000001 : jump sctm_o0_1 }
+ }
+
+ map sctm_o1 {
+ type mark : counter
+ elements = { 0x00000000 : "c_o0_0" }
+ }
+
+ chain sctm_o0_0 {
+ }
+
+ chain sctm_o0_1 {
+ }
+
+ chain SET_ctmark_RPLYroute {
+ meta mark >> 8 & 0xf vmap @sctm_o0
+ counter name meta mark >> 8 & 0xf map @sctm_o1
+ }
+}
diff --git a/tests/shell/testcases/maps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0 b/tests/shell/testcases/maps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..0d933553e6b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/shell/testcases/maps/vmap_mark_bitwise_0
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+
+set -e
+
+RULESET="table ip x {
+ chain sctm_o0_0 {
+ }
+
+ chain sctm_o0_1 {
+ }
+
+ map sctm_o0 {
+ type mark : verdict
+ elements = {
+ 0x0 : jump sctm_o0_0,
+ 0x1 : jump sctm_o0_1,
+ }
+ }
+
+ counter c_o0_0 {}
+
+ map sctm_o1 {
+ type mark : counter
+ elements = {
+ 0x0 : \"c_o0_0\",
+ }
+ }
+
+ chain SET_ctmark_RPLYroute {
+ meta mark >> 8 & 0xf vmap @sctm_o0
+ }
+
+ chain SET_ctmark_RPLYroute {
+ counter name meta mark >> 8 & 0xf map @sctm_o1
+ }
+}"
+
+$NFT -f - <<< $RULESET
--
2.30.2
