Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: Unbreak audit log reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 06:41:13PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 6:21 PM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:39:41PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 03:56:41PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > If it is a bug, please submit a fix for this as soon as possible Pablo.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your support, but I can take over, too. The number of
> > > notifications emitted even for a small ruleset is not ideal, also. It's
> > > just a bit sad that I ACKed the patch already and so it went out the
> > > door. Florian, can we still put a veto there?
> >
> > Phil, kernel was crashing after your patch, this was resulting in a
> > kernel panic when running tests here. I had to revert your patches
> > locally to keep running tests.
> >
> > Please, just send an incremental fix to adjust the idx, revert will
> > leave things in worse state.
> 
> If we can get a fix out soon then I'm fine with that, if we can't get
> a fix out soon then a revert may be wise.

I believe it should be possible to fix this in the next -rc, which
should be quick. If Phil is busy I will jump on this and I will keep
you on Cc so you and Richard can review.

I apologize for forgetting to Cc you in first place.

> > Audit does not show chains either, which is not very useful to locate
> > what where exactly the rules have been reset, but that can probably
> > discussed in net-next. Richard provided a way to extend this if audit
> > maintainer find it useful too.
> 
> Richard was correct in saying that new fields must be added to the end
> of the record.  The only correction I would make to Richard's comments
> is that we tend to prefer that if a field is present in a record, it
> is always present in a record; if there is no useful information to
> log in that field, a "?" can be substituted for the value (e.g.
> "nftfield=?").

Thanks for clarification, hopefully this will help to explore
extensions to include chain information in the logs. I think that
might help users to understand better the kind of updated that
happened in the Netfilter subsystem.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux