On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 4:54 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2023-08-30 17:46, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 07:51:57PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > Since set element reset is not integrated into nf_tables' transaction > > > logic, an explicit log call is needed, similar to NFT_MSG_GETOBJ_RESET > > > handling. > > > > > > For the sake of simplicity, catchall element reset will always generate > > > a dedicated log entry. This relieves nf_tables_dump_set() from having to > > > adjust the logged element count depending on whether a catchall element > > > was found or not. > > > > Applied, thanks Phil > > Thanks Phil, Pablo. If it isn't too late, please add my > Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> Similarly, you can add my ACK. FWIW, if you're sending patches out during the first few days of the merge window it might be advisable to wait more than a day or two to give the relevant maintainers a chance to review the patch. Also, as a note for future submissions, we've moved the audit kernel mailing list to audit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- paul-moore.com
