Re: [nft PATCH 2/2] meta: use reentrant localtime_r()/gmtime_r() functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [nft PATCH 2/2] meta: use reentrant localtime_r()/gmtime_r() functions
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 10:54:37 +0200
Cc: NetFilter <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230822081318.1370371-2-thaller@redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:13:10AM +0200, Thomas Haller wrote:
> These functions are POSIX.1-2001. We should have them in all
> environments we care about.
> 
> Use them as they are thread-safe.

Also applied, thanks

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [nft PATCH 2/2] meta: use reentrant localtime_r()/gmtime_r() functions
  - From: Thomas Haller

References:
- [nft PATCH 1/2] meta: don't assume time_t is 64 bit in date_type_print()
  - From: Thomas Haller
- [nft PATCH 2/2] meta: use reentrant localtime_r()/gmtime_r() functions
  - From: Thomas Haller

Prev by Date: Re: [nft PATCH 1/2] meta: don't assume time_t is 64 bit in date_type_print()
Next by Date: Re: [nft PATCH 1/2] meta: don't assume time_t is 64 bit in date_type_print()
Previous by thread: [nft PATCH 2/2] meta: use reentrant localtime_r()/gmtime_r() functions
Next by thread: Re: [nft PATCH 2/2] meta: use reentrant localtime_r()/gmtime_r() functions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux