On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 02:33:32PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Use nf_tables_gc_list_lock spinlock, not nf_tables_destroy_list_lock to
> protect the destroy list.
For the record, this text should be instead:
... to protect the gc_list.
> Fixes: 5f68718b34a5 ("netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction API to avoid race with control plane")
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index a255456efae4..eb8b1167dced 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> @@ -9456,9 +9456,9 @@ static void nft_trans_gc_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct nft_trans_gc *trans, *next;
> LIST_HEAD(trans_gc_list);
>
> - spin_lock(&nf_tables_destroy_list_lock);
> + spin_lock(&nf_tables_gc_list_lock);
> list_splice_init(&nf_tables_gc_list, &trans_gc_list);
> - spin_unlock(&nf_tables_destroy_list_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&nf_tables_gc_list_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(trans, next, &trans_gc_list, list) {
> list_del(&trans->list);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
