On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:19 PM Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Justin Stitt <justinstitt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Use `strscpy_pad` instead of `strncpy`. > > I don't think that any of these need zero-padding. It's a more consistent change with the rest of the series and I don't believe it has much different behavior to `strncpy` (other than NUL-termination) as that will continue to pad to `n` as well. Do you think the `_pad` for 1/7, 6/7 and 7/7 should be changed back to `strscpy` in a v3? I really am shooting in the dark as it is quite hard to tell whether or not a buffer is expected to be NUL-padded or not.
