On Wednesday 2023-08-02 04:03, Phil Sutter wrote: >No content changes intended, just type commands in bold and the single >path reference in italics. > >diff --git a/iptables/iptables.8.in b/iptables/iptables.8.in >index 71a6251d6b00c..5a9cec6c9eb35 100644 >--- a/iptables/iptables.8.in >+++ b/iptables/iptables.8.in >@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ or > .TP > \fB\-S\fP, \fB\-\-list\-rules\fP [\fIchain\fP] > Print all rules in the selected chain. If no chain is selected, all >-chains are printed like iptables-save. Like every other iptables command, >+chains are printed like \fBiptables-save\fP. Like every other iptables command, > it applies to the specified table (filter is the default). Lacking different markup options, I used bold for things you type verbatim (would use <tt></tt> in HTML or `` in MD/RST), and italics for replacables. In that instance, ...printed like iptables-save. was meant to indeed read like a name, i.e. ...printed like iptables-save(8). not like a command, i.e. ...printed like `iptables-save`. (Also note that ifff you did \fBiptables-save\fP, it would have need to be \fBiptables\-save\fP, because that is required for verbatim forms.) The same argument goes for all the rest: >@@ -242,30 +242,30 @@ The following parameters make up a rule specification (as used in the > add, delete, insert, replace and append commands). > .TP > \fB\-4\fP, \fB\-\-ipv4\fP >-This option has no effect in iptables and iptables-restore. >+This option has no effect in \fBiptables\fP and \fBiptables-restore\fP. > If a rule using the \fB\-4\fP option is inserted with (and only with) >-ip6tables-restore, it will be silently ignored. Any other uses will throw an >+\fBip6tables-restore\fP, it will be silently ignored. Any other uses will throw an ...
