Hello Florian, On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 2:49 PM Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Igor Raits <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > We started to observe the issue regarding ebtables-nft and how it > > > can't wipe rules when specifying full rule. Removing the rule by index > > > works fine, though. Also with kernel 6.1.y it works completely fine. > > > > > > I've started with 1.8.8 provided in CentOS Stream 9, then tried the > > > latest git version and all behave exactly the same. See the behavior > > > below. As you can see, simple DROP works, but more complex one do not. > > > > > > As bugzilla requires some special sign-up procedure, apologize for > > > reporting it directly here in the ML. > > > > Thanks for the report, I'll look into it later today. > > Its a bug in ebtables-nft, it fails to delete the rule since > > 938154b93be8cd611ddfd7bafc1849f3c4355201, > netfilter: nf_tables: reject unbound anonymous set before commit phase > > But its possible do remove the rule via > nft delete rule .. handle $x > > so the breakge is limited to ebtables-nft. Thanks for confirmation and additional information regarding where exactly the issue was introduced. The ebtables-nft (well, ebtables in general) is heavily used by the OpenStack Neutron (in linuxbridge mode), so this breaks our setup quite a bit. Would you recommend to revert kernel change or would you have the actual fix soon (ebtables-nft or kernel)?
