On 06/06/2023 11:10, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:
6/5/2023 6:02 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
Hi Konstantin,
The kernel code looks good. I found some issues in tests and
documentation, and I'm still reviewing the whole patches. In the
meantime, I've pushed it in -next, we'll see how it goes.
We need to have this new code covered by syzkaller. I'll work on that
unless you want to.
Regards,
Mickaël
Hi, Mickaël!
I have never set up syzkaller. Do you have a syzkaller scenario for
Landlock code? I need some hints. I will give it a shot.
You can get a look at https://github.com/google/syzkaller/pull/3423 or
other Landlock-related PR.
The setup might be a bit challenging though, but it will be a good
investment for future kernel changes.
Regards,
Konstantin.
On 15/05/2023 18:13, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
Hi,
This is a new V11 patch related to Landlock LSM network confinement.
It is based on the landlock's -next branch on top of v6.2-rc3+ kernel version:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux.git/log/?h=next
It brings refactoring of previous patch version V10.
Mostly there are fixes of logic and typos, refactoring some selftests.
All test were run in QEMU evironment and compiled with
-static flag.
1. network_test: 36/36 tests passed.
2. base_test: 7/7 tests passed.
3. fs_test: 78/78 tests passed.
4. ptrace_test: 8/8 tests passed.
Previous versions:
v10: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20230323085226.1432550-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v9: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20230116085818.165539-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v8: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20221021152644.155136-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v7: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20220829170401.834298-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v6: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20220621082313.3330667-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20220516152038.39594-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20220309134459.6448-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20220124080215.265538-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20211228115212.703084-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20211210072123.386713-1-konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx/
Konstantin Meskhidze (11):
landlock: Make ruleset's access masks more generic
landlock: Refactor landlock_find_rule/insert_rule
landlock: Refactor merge/inherit_ruleset functions
landlock: Move and rename layer helpers
landlock: Refactor layer helpers
landlock: Refactor landlock_add_rule() syscall
landlock: Add network rules and TCP hooks support
selftests/landlock: Share enforce_ruleset()
selftests/landlock: Add 11 new test suites dedicated to network
samples/landlock: Add network demo
landlock: Document Landlock's network support
Mickaël Salaün (1):
landlock: Allow filesystem layout changes for domains without such
rule type
Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 89 +-
include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 48 +
samples/landlock/sandboxer.c | 128 +-
security/landlock/Kconfig | 1 +
security/landlock/Makefile | 2 +
security/landlock/fs.c | 232 +--
security/landlock/limits.h | 7 +-
security/landlock/net.c | 174 +++
security/landlock/net.h | 26 +
security/landlock/ruleset.c | 405 +++++-
security/landlock/ruleset.h | 185 ++-
security/landlock/setup.c | 2 +
security/landlock/syscalls.c | 163 ++-
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h | 10 +
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config | 4 +
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 74 +-
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 1317 ++++++++++++++++++
18 files changed, 2520 insertions(+), 349 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 security/landlock/net.c
create mode 100644 security/landlock/net.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
--
2.25.1
.
