[PATCH nft] evaluate: set NFT_SET_EVAL flag if dynamic set already exists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 # cat test.nft
 table ip test {
        set dlist {
                type ipv4_addr
                size 65535
        }

        chain output {
                type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept;
                udp dport 1234 update @dlist { ip daddr } counter packets 0 bytes 0
        }
 }
 # nft -f test.nft
 # nft -f test.nft
 test.nft:2:6-10: Error: Could not process rule: File exists
         set dlist {
             ^^^^^

Phil Sutter says:

In the first call, the set lacking 'dynamic' flag does not exist
and is therefore added to the cache. Consequently, both the 'add set'
command and the set statement point at the same set object. In the
second call, a set with same name exists already, so the object created
for 'add set' command is not added to cache and consequently not updated
with the missing flag. The kernel thus rejects the NEWSET request as the
existing set differs from the new one.

Set on the NFT_SET_EVAL flag if the existing set sets it on.

Fixes: 8d443adfcc8c1 ("evaluate: attempt to set_eval flag if dynamic updates requested")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Phil,

Maybe this fix so there is no need for revert?

 src/evaluate.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index 63e3e4147a40..09ad4ea19409 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -4516,6 +4516,14 @@ static int set_evaluate(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct set *set)
 		existing_set = set_cache_find(table, set->handle.set.name);
 		if (!existing_set)
 			set_cache_add(set_get(set), table);
+
+		if (existing_set && existing_set->flags & NFT_SET_EVAL) {
+			uint32_t existing_flags = existing_set->flags & ~NFT_SET_EVAL;
+			uint32_t new_flags = set->flags & ~NFT_SET_EVAL;
+
+			if (existing_flags == new_flags)
+				set->flags |= NFT_SET_EVAL;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (!(set->flags & NFT_SET_INTERVAL) && set->automerge)
-- 
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux