Hi Pablo,
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:54:28PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:50:22PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > This is a revert of commit 8d443adfcc8c1 ("evaluate: attempt to set_eval
> > flag if dynamic updates requested"), implementing the alternative
> > mentioned in the comment it added.
> >
> > Reason is the inconsistent behaviour when applying the same ruleset
> > twice: In the first call, the set lacking 'dynamic' flag does not exist
> > and is therefore added to the cache. Consequently, both the 'add set'
> > command and the set statement point at the same set object. In the
> > second call, a set with same name exists already, so the object created
> > for 'add set' command is not added to cache and consequently not updated
> > with the missing flag. The kernel thus rejects the NEWSET request as the
> > existing set differs from the new one.
>
> # cat test.nft
> flush ruleset
Just remove this 'flush ruleset' call, then it should trigger.
Cheers, Phil
