Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +int bpf_nf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > +{
> > + struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> > + struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
> > + struct bpf_nf_link *link;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (attr->link_create.flags)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (attr->link_create.netfilter.reserved[0] | attr->link_create.netfilter.reserved[1])
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Why add 'reserved' name that we cannot change later?
> I think 'flags' is enough.
OK, I'll zap this.
> > + link->hook_ops.pf = attr->link_create.netfilter.pf;
> > + link->hook_ops.priority = attr->link_create.netfilter.prio;
>
> let's use the same name in both cases ? Either prio or priority. Both sound fine.
OK, I'll go with "priority" then because thats what its named in
nf_hook_ops structure.
