Re: [PATCH net,v2] uapi: linux: restore IPPROTO_MAX to 256 and add IPPROTO_UAPI_MAX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH net,v2] uapi: linux: restore IPPROTO_MAX to 256 and add IPPROTO_UAPI_MAX
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:18:16 -0700
Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, mathew.j.martineau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mptcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230406092558.459491-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

On Thu,  6 Apr 2023 11:25:58 +0200 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>    IPPROTO_RAW = 255,		/* Raw IP packets			*/
> +  IPPROTO_MAX,
>  #define IPPROTO_RAW	

nit: any reason the IPPROTO_MAX is in between the enum entry 
and its associated define?

References:
- [PATCH net,v2] uapi: linux: restore IPPROTO_MAX to 256 and add IPPROTO_UAPI_MAX
  - From: Pablo Neira Ayuso

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH nftables 8/8] test: py: add tests for shifted nat port-ranges
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net,v2] uapi: linux: restore IPPROTO_MAX to 256 and add IPPROTO_UAPI_MAX
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH net,v2] uapi: linux: restore IPPROTO_MAX to 256 and add IPPROTO_UAPI_MAX
Next by thread: [PATCH] src: try SO_SNDBUF before SO_SNDBUFFORCE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux