2/10/2023 8:39 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
On 16/01/2023 09:58, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
This commit adds network rules support in the ruleset management
helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset syscall.
Refactor user space API to support network actions. Add new network
access flags, network rule and network attributes. Increment Landlock
ABI version. Expand access_masks_t to u32 to be sure network access
rights can be stored. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect()
LSM hooks, which enable to restrict TCP socket binding and connection
to specific ports.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v8:
* Squashes commits.
* Refactors commit message.
* Changes UAPI port field to __be16.
* Changes logic of bind/connect hooks with AF_UNSPEC families.
* Adds address length checking.
* Minor fixes.
Changes since v7:
* Squashes commits.
* Increments ABI version to 4.
* Refactors commit message.
* Minor fixes.
Changes since v6:
* Renames landlock_set_net_access_mask() to landlock_add_net_access_mask()
because it OR values.
* Makes landlock_add_net_access_mask() more resilient incorrect values.
* Refactors landlock_get_net_access_mask().
* Renames LANDLOCK_MASK_SHIFT_NET to LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_NET and use
LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS as value.
* Updates access_masks_t to u32 to support network access actions.
* Refactors landlock internal functions to support network actions with
landlock_key/key_type/id types.
Changes since v5:
* Gets rid of partial revert from landlock_add_rule
syscall.
* Formats code with clang-format-14.
Changes since v4:
* Refactors landlock_create_ruleset() - splits ruleset and
masks checks.
* Refactors landlock_create_ruleset() and landlock mask
setters/getters to support two rule types.
* Refactors landlock_add_rule syscall add_rule_path_beneath
function by factoring out get_ruleset_from_fd() and
landlock_put_ruleset().
Changes since v3:
* Splits commit.
* Adds network rule support for internal landlock functions.
* Adds set_mask and get_mask for network.
* Adds rb_root root_net_port.
[...]
+static int check_socket_access(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
+ struct sockaddr *address, __be16 port,
+ access_mask_t access_request)
+{
+ bool allowed = false;
+ layer_mask_t layer_masks[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET] = {};
+ const struct landlock_rule *rule;
+ access_mask_t handled_access;
+ const struct landlock_id id = {
+ .key.data = port,
+ .type = LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
+ };
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!domain))
+ return 0;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(domain->num_layers < 1))
+ return -EACCES;
+
+ switch (address->sa_family) {
+ case AF_UNSPEC:
+ /*
+ * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves the TCP
+ * association, which have the same effect as closing the
+ * connection while retaining the socket object (i.e., the file
+ * descriptor). As for dropping privileges, closing
+ * connections is always allowed.
+ */
+ if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * For compatibility reason, accept AF_UNSPEC for bind
+ * accesses (mapped to AF_INET) only if the address is
+ * INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind). Checking the address is
+ * required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of
+ * -EAFNOSUPPORT.
+ */
+ if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP) {
+ const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
+ (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
+
+ if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY))
+ return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+ }
+
+ fallthrough;
+ case AF_INET:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case AF_INET6:
+#endif
+ rule = landlock_find_rule(domain, id);
+ handled_access = landlock_init_layer_masks(
+ domain, access_request, &layer_masks,
+ LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
+ allowed = landlock_unmask_layers(rule, handled_access,
+ &layer_masks,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(layer_masks));
+
+ fallthrough;
You can remove this fallthrough.
+ }
+ return allowed ? 0 : -EACCES;
+}
+
+static u16 get_port(const struct sockaddr *const address)
+{
+ /* Gets port value in host byte order. */
+ switch (address->sa_family) {
+ case AF_UNSPEC:
+ case AF_INET: {
+ const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
+ (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
+ return sockaddr->sin_port;
+ }
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case AF_INET6: {
+ const struct sockaddr_in6 *const sockaddr_ip6 =
+ (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address;
+ return sockaddr_ip6->sin6_port;
+ }
+#endif
+ }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address,
+ int addrlen)
+{
+ int ret;
+ const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom =
+ landlock_get_current_domain();
landlock_get_current_domain() should only be called by a
get_current_net_domain() wrapper that checks if the current domain
handles network accesses. See get_current_fs_domain() in patch 2/12.
Hi Mickaël.
I have question:
static access_mask_t
get_raw_handled_fs_accesses(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain)
{
access_mask_t access_dom = 0;
size_t layer_level;
for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++)
access_dom |=
landlock_get_raw_fs_access_mask(domain, layer_level);
return access_dom & LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS;
}
landlock_get_raw_fs_access_mask() function is already mask by
LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS. We could get rid of access_dom masking.
What do you think?
+
+ if (!dom)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Check if it's a TCP socket. */
+ if (sock->type != SOCK_STREAM)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = check_addrlen(address, addrlen);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return check_socket_access(dom, address, get_port(address),
+ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP);
+}
.
