Re: [ipset PATCH 0/2] Two minor code fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 01:05:23PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:56:29PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:28:36PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > > These were identified by Coverity tool, no problems in practice. Still
> > > > > worth fixing to reduce noise in code checkers.
> > > > 
> > > > LGTM.
> > > > 
> > > > Did you run ipset xlate tests? These should not break those but just
> > > > in case.
> > > 
> > > I didn't, thanks for the reminder. Testsuite fails, but it does with
> > > HEAD as well. And so does the other testsuite ("make tests"), BtW. I'll
> > > investigate.
> > 
> > Does this work after your testsuite updates? If so, push them out.
> 
> Yes, it does. Should I push the testsuite updates, too? I'm uncertain
> about the s/vrrp/carp/, don't want to break anyone's test setup.

I can see some distros still use vrrp en /etc/protocols, yes, I'm
ambivalent on this one.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux