Re: [PATCH nf-next 00/13] Support for shifted port-ranges in NAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jeremy Sowden (13):
>   netfilter: nft_nat: correct length for loading protocol registers
>   netfilter: nft_masq: correct length for loading protocol registers
>   netfilter: nft_redir: correct value of inet type `.maxattrs`
>   netfilter: nft_redir: correct length for loading protocol registers

I think the fixess above should be routed through the 'nf' tree, I
don't see why we need to hold them in -next trees for another 3 months.




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux