Re: [PATCH v9 06/12] landlock: Refactor _unmask_layers() and _init_layer_masks()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





2/10/2023 8:38 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:

On 16/01/2023 09:58, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
Add new key_type argument to the landlock_init_layer_masks() helper.
Add a masks_array_size argument to the landlock_unmask_layers() helper.
These modifications support implementing new rule types in the next
Landlock versions.

Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes since v8:
* None.

Changes since v7:
* Refactors commit message, adds a co-developer.
* Minor fixes.

Changes since v6:
* Removes masks_size attribute from init_layer_masks().
* Refactors init_layer_masks() with new landlock_key_type.

Changes since v5:
* Splits commit.
* Formats code with clang-format-14.

Changes since v4:
* Refactors init_layer_masks(), get_handled_accesses()
and unmask_layers() functions to support multiple rule types.
* Refactors landlock_get_fs_access_mask() function with
LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS mask.

Changes since v3:
* Splits commit.
* Refactors landlock_unmask_layers functions.

---
  security/landlock/fs.c      | 43 ++++++++++++++++--------------
  security/landlock/ruleset.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
  security/landlock/ruleset.h | 17 ++++++------
  3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
index 73a7399f93ba..a73dbd3f9ddb 100644
--- a/security/landlock/fs.c
+++ b/security/landlock/fs.c


[...]

@@ -658,10 +677,13 @@ access_mask_t landlock_init_layer_masks(
  		const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
  		unsigned long access_bit;
- for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req,
-				 ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks)) {
+		for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req, num_access) {
+			/*
+			 * Artificially handles all initially denied by default
+			 * access rights.
+			 */

No need to re-add this old comment which was removed with patch 2/12.

 Ok. Will be fixed.

  			if (BIT_ULL(access_bit) &
-			    landlock_get_fs_access_mask(domain, layer_level)) {
+			    get_access_mask(domain, layer_level)) {
  				(*layer_masks)[access_bit] |=
  					BIT_ULL(layer_level);
  				handled_accesses |= BIT_ULL(access_bit);
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
index 60a3c4d4d961..77349764e111 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
@@ -266,14 +266,15 @@ landlock_get_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
  	return landlock_get_raw_fs_access_mask(ruleset, layer_level) |
  	       ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED;
  }
-bool landlock_unmask_layers(
-	const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
-	const access_mask_t access_request,
-	layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS]);
+bool landlock_unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
+			    const access_mask_t access_request,
+			    layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[],
+			    const size_t masks_array_size);
-access_mask_t landlock_init_layer_masks(
-	const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
-	const access_mask_t access_request,
-	layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS]);
+access_mask_t
+landlock_init_layer_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
+			  const access_mask_t access_request,
+			  layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[],
+			  const enum landlock_key_type key_type);
#endif /* _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_RULESET_H */
.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux