On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 05:03:18PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:50:27PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 06:18:34PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Monday 2023-01-16 12:57, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > > >On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > > > > > > > >IIRC ebtables is using a custom ethertype file, because definitions > > > > >are different there. > > > > > > > > > >But is this installed file used in any way these days? > > > > > > > > Probably not; the version I have has this to say: > > > > > > > > # This list could be found on: > > > > # http://www.iana.org/assignments/ethernet-numbers > > > > # http://www.iana.org/assignments/ieee-802-numbers > > > > > > > > With such official-ness, ebtables's ethertypes has a rather low priority. > > > > > > This header statement exists even in legacy ebtables repo' version. I > > > fear the opposite is the case and everyone's rather copying from ebtables > > > or iptables just to provide /etc/ethertypes without depending on the > > > tools. > > > > > > My local Gentoo install at least has /etc/ethertypes exactly as in > > > ebtables repo and the package source states "File extracted from the > > > iptables tarball". > > > > > > Maybe we're the original source? > > > > In ebtables, there _PATH_ETHERTYPES which is indirectly used by > > getethertypebyname() by a few extensions. > > > > In iptables, this code exists too, using a different definition: > > > > include/xtables.h:#define XT_PATH_ETHERTYPES "/etc/ethertypes" > > > > extensions/libebt_arp.c: ent = xtables_getethertypebyname(argv[optind - 1]); > > extensions/libebt_vlan.c: ethent = xtables_getethertypebyname(optarg); > > > > It seems this file is required by a few extensions and the translation > > infrastructure. > > Thanks for investigating. I guess dropping a file we depend on to exist > *and* introduced in the first place is shooting one's own foot with > extra steps. Also packagers are used to ignore the file (if not needed) > already. :) TBH, I thought this was too a left-over, it is good to revisit stuff.
