From: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
When first_ip is 0, last_ip is 0xFFFFFFFF, and netmask is 31, the value of
an arithmetic expression 2 << (netmask - mask_bits - 1) is subject
to overflow due to a failure casting operands to a larger data type
before performing the arithmetic.
Note that it's harmless since the value will be checked at the next step.
Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
(linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: b9fed748185a ("netfilter: ipset: Check and reject crazy /0 input parameters")
Signed-off-by: Ilia.Gavrilov <Ilia.Gavrilov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_bitmap_ip.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_bitmap_ip.c b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_bitmap_ip.c
index a8ce04a4bb72..e4fa00abde6a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_bitmap_ip.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_bitmap_ip.c
@@ -308,8 +308,8 @@ bitmap_ip_create(struct net *net, struct ip_set *set, struct nlattr *tb[],
return -IPSET_ERR_BITMAP_RANGE;
pr_debug("mask_bits %u, netmask %u\n", mask_bits, netmask);
- hosts = 2 << (32 - netmask - 1);
- elements = 2 << (netmask - mask_bits - 1);
+ hosts = 2U << (32 - netmask - 1);
+ elements = 2UL << (netmask - mask_bits - 1);
}
if (elements > IPSET_BITMAP_MAX_RANGE + 1)
return -IPSET_ERR_BITMAP_RANGE_SIZE;
--
2.30.2
