On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:35:29PM +0800, Qingfang DENG wrote: > The for-loop was broken from the start. It translates to: > > for (i = 0; i < 4; i += 4) > > which means the loop statement is run only once, so only the highest > 32-bit of the IPv6 address gets mangled. > > Fix the loop increment. Applied, thanks
