It is not needed, one can just use 'reg' function parameter in its
place.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
---
iptables/nft-bridge.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/iptables/nft-bridge.c b/iptables/nft-bridge.c
index 596dfdf8991f1..d1385cc3593b9 100644
--- a/iptables/nft-bridge.c
+++ b/iptables/nft-bridge.c
@@ -324,7 +324,6 @@ static int lookup_analyze_payloads(struct nft_xt_ctx *ctx,
bool *dst, bool *ip)
{
const struct nft_xt_ctx_reg *reg;
- uint32_t sreg_count;
int val, val2 = -1;
reg = nft_xt_ctx_get_sreg(ctx, sreg);
@@ -336,7 +335,6 @@ static int lookup_analyze_payloads(struct nft_xt_ctx *ctx,
return -1;
}
- sreg_count = sreg;
switch (key_len) {
case 12: /* ether + ipv4addr */
val = lookup_check_ether_payload(reg->payload.base,
@@ -349,9 +347,9 @@ static int lookup_analyze_payloads(struct nft_xt_ctx *ctx,
return -1;
}
- sreg_count = nft_get_next_reg(sreg_count, ETH_ALEN);
+ sreg = nft_get_next_reg(sreg, ETH_ALEN);
- reg = nft_xt_ctx_get_sreg(ctx, sreg_count);
+ reg = nft_xt_ctx_get_sreg(ctx, sreg);
if (!reg) {
ctx->errmsg = "next lookup register is invalid";
return -1;
--
2.34.1
