We're seeing the following new warnings on netdev/build_32bit and
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn CI jobs:
../net/core/filter.c:8608:1: warning: symbol
'nf_conn_btf_access_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:8611:5: warning: symbol 'nfct_bsa' was not
declared. Should it be static?
Fix by ensuring extern declaration is present while compiling filter.o.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/filter.h | 6 ++++++
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h | 7 +------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 527ae1d64e27..96de256b2c8d 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -567,6 +567,12 @@ struct sk_filter {
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(bpf_stats_enabled_key);
+extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
+extern int (*nfct_bsa)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
+ const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
+ enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
+ enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
+
typedef unsigned int (*bpf_dispatcher_fn)(const void *ctx,
const struct bpf_insn *insnsi,
unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *,
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
index a61a93d1c6dc..cf2c0423d174 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/kconfig.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
@@ -14,12 +15,6 @@
extern int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
extern void cleanup_nf_conntrack_bpf(void);
-extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
-extern int (*nfct_bsa)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
- const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
- enum bpf_access_type atype, u32 *next_btf_id,
- enum bpf_type_flag *flag);
-
#else
static inline int register_nf_conntrack_bpf(void)
--
2.37.1
