[PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] bpf: Use 0 instead of NOT_INIT for btf_struct_access() writes

[Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Returning a bpf_reg_type only makes sense in the context of a BPF_READ.
For writes, prefer to explicitly return 0 for clarity.

Note that is non-functional change as it just so happened that NOT_INIT
== 0.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 85a9e500c42d..6da16ae6a962 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int bpf_tcp_ca_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
-	return NOT_INIT;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_tcp_send_ack, struct tcp_sock *, tp, u32, rcv_nxt)
-- 
2.37.1