Le 07/09/2022 à 05:04, Alexei Starovoitov a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 11:57 PM Nicolas Dichtel > <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Le 31/08/2022 à 23:57, Florian Westphal a écrit : >>> Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> This helps gradually moving towards move epbf for those that >>>>> still heavily rely on the classic forwarding path. >>>> >>>> No one is using it. >>>> If it was, we would have seen at least one bug report over >>>> all these years. We've seen none. >>> >>> Err, it IS used, else I would not have sent this patch. >>> >>>> very reasonable early on and turned out to be useless with >>>> zero users. >>>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT and BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT* >>>> are in this category. >>> >>> I doubt it had 0 users. Those users probably moved to something >>> better? >> We are using BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT to perform custom encapsulations. >> What could we used to replace that? > > SCHED_CLS. It has all of the features of cls and act combined. Indeed, thanks.
