On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 02:06:28PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 01:37:40PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 01:18:17PM +0200, Sven Auhagen wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:56:38PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 09:28:03PM +0300, Oz Shlomo wrote:
> > > > > Connections leaving the established state (due to RST / FIN TCP packets)
> > > > > set the flow table teardown flag. The packet path continues to set lower
> > > > > timeout value as per the new TCP state but the offload flag remains set.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hence, the conntrack garbage collector may race to undo the timeout
> > > > > adjustment of the packet path, leaving the conntrack entry in place with
> > > > > the internal offload timeout (one day).
> > > > >
> > > > > Avoid ct gc timeout overwrite by flagging teared down flowtable
> > > > > connections.
> > > > >
> > > > > On the nftables side we only need to allow established TCP connections to
> > > > > create a flow offload entry. Since we can not guaruantee that
> > > > > flow_offload_teardown is called by a TCP FIN packet we also need to make
> > > > > sure that flow_offload_fixup_ct is also called in flow_offload_del
> > > > > and only fixes up established TCP connections.
> > > > [...]
> > > > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > > > > index 0164e5f522e8..324fdb62c08b 100644
> > > > > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > > > > @@ -1477,7 +1477,8 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > > tmp = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
> > > > >
> > > > > if (test_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &tmp->status)) {
> > > > > - nf_ct_offload_timeout(tmp);
> > > >
> > > > Hm, it is the trick to avoid checking for IPS_OFFLOAD from the packet
> > > > path that triggers the race, ie. nf_ct_is_expired()
> > > >
> > > > The flowtable ct fixup races with conntrack gc collector.
> > > >
> > > > Clearing IPS_OFFLOAD might result in offloading the entry again for
> > > > the closing packets.
> > > >
> > > > Probably clear IPS_OFFLOAD from teardown, and skip offload if flow is
> > > > in a TCP state that represent closure?
> > >
> > > > if (unlikely(!tcph || tcph->fin || tcph->rst))
> > > > goto out;
> > > >
> > > > this is already the intention in the existing code.
> > > >
> > > > If this does work, could you keep IPS_OFFLOAD_TEARDOWN_BIT internal,
> > > > ie. no in uapi? Define it at include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h and
> > > > add a comment regarding this to avoid an overlap in the future.
> > > >
> > > > > + if (!test_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_TEARDOWN_BIT, &tmp->status))
> > > > > + nf_ct_offload_timeout(tmp);
> > > > > continue;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> > > > > index 3db256da919b..aaed1a244013 100644
> > > > > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> > > > > @@ -177,14 +177,8 @@ int flow_offload_route_init(struct flow_offload *flow,
> > > > > }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flow_offload_route_init);
> > > > >
> > > > > -static void flow_offload_fixup_tcp(struct ip_ct_tcp *tcp)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - tcp->state = TCP_CONNTRACK_ESTABLISHED;
> > > > > - tcp->seen[0].td_maxwin = 0;
> > > > > - tcp->seen[1].td_maxwin = 0;
> > > > > -}
> > > > >
> > > > > -static void flow_offload_fixup_ct_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > > > +static void flow_offload_fixup_ct(struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
> > > > > int l4num = nf_ct_protonum(ct);
> > > > > @@ -192,8 +186,12 @@ static void flow_offload_fixup_ct_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > > >
> > > > > if (l4num == IPPROTO_TCP) {
> > > > > struct nf_tcp_net *tn = nf_tcp_pernet(net);
> > > > > + struct ip_ct_tcp *tcp = &ct->proto.tcp;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + tcp->seen[0].td_maxwin = 0;
> > > > > + tcp->seen[1].td_maxwin = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > - timeout = tn->timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_ESTABLISHED];
> > > > > + timeout = tn->timeouts[ct->proto.tcp.state];
> > > > > timeout -= tn->offload_timeout;
> > > > > } else if (l4num == IPPROTO_UDP) {
> > > > > struct nf_udp_net *tn = nf_udp_pernet(net);
> > > > > @@ -211,18 +209,6 @@ static void flow_offload_fixup_ct_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > > > WRITE_ONCE(ct->timeout, nfct_time_stamp + timeout);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > -static void flow_offload_fixup_ct_state(struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - if (nf_ct_protonum(ct) == IPPROTO_TCP)
> > > > > - flow_offload_fixup_tcp(&ct->proto.tcp);
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > -static void flow_offload_fixup_ct(struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - flow_offload_fixup_ct_state(ct);
> > > > > - flow_offload_fixup_ct_timeout(ct);
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > static void flow_offload_route_release(struct flow_offload *flow)
> > > > > {
> > > > > nft_flow_dst_release(flow, FLOW_OFFLOAD_DIR_ORIGINAL);
> > > > > @@ -353,6 +339,10 @@ static inline bool nf_flow_has_expired(const struct flow_offload *flow)
> > > > > static void flow_offload_del(struct nf_flowtable *flow_table,
> > > > > struct flow_offload *flow)
> > > > > {
> > > > > + struct nf_conn *ct = flow->ct;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + set_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_TEARDOWN_BIT, &flow->ct->status);
> > > > > +
> > > > > rhashtable_remove_fast(&flow_table->rhashtable,
> > > > > &flow->tuplehash[FLOW_OFFLOAD_DIR_ORIGINAL].node,
> > > > > nf_flow_offload_rhash_params);
> > > > > @@ -360,12 +350,11 @@ static void flow_offload_del(struct nf_flowtable *flow_table,
> > > > > &flow->tuplehash[FLOW_OFFLOAD_DIR_REPLY].node,
> > > > > nf_flow_offload_rhash_params);
> > > > >
> > > > > - clear_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &flow->ct->status);
> > > > > -
> > > > > if (nf_flow_has_expired(flow))
> > > > > - flow_offload_fixup_ct(flow->ct);
> > > > > - else
> > > > > - flow_offload_fixup_ct_timeout(flow->ct);
> > > > > + flow_offload_fixup_ct(ct);
> > > >
> > > > Very unlikely, but race might still happen between fixup and
> > > > clear IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT with gc below?
> > > >
> > > > Without checking from the packet path, the conntrack gc might race to
> > > > refresh the timeout, I don't see a 100% race free solution.
> > > >
> > > > Probably update the nf_ct_offload_timeout to a shorter value than a
> > > > day would mitigate this issue too.
> > >
> > > This section of the code is now protected by IPS_OFFLOAD_TEARDOWN_BIT
> > > which will prevent the update via nf_ct_offload_timeout.
> > > We set it at the beginning of flow_offload_del and flow_offload_teardown.
> > >
> > > Since flow_offload_teardown is only called on TCP packets
> > > we also need to set it at flow_offload_del to prevent the race.
> > >
> > > This should prevent the race at this point.
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > > > > + clear_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &ct->status);
> > > > > + clear_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_TEARDOWN_BIT, &ct->status);
> > > > >
> > > > > flow_offload_free(flow);
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -373,8 +362,9 @@ static void flow_offload_del(struct nf_flowtable *flow_table,
> > > > > void flow_offload_teardown(struct flow_offload *flow)
> > > > > {
> > > > > set_bit(NF_FLOW_TEARDOWN, &flow->flags);
> > > > > + set_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_TEARDOWN_BIT, &flow->ct->status);
> > > > >
> > > > > - flow_offload_fixup_ct_state(flow->ct);
> > > > > + flow_offload_fixup_ct(flow->ct);
> > > > > }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flow_offload_teardown);
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
> > > > > index 900d48c810a1..9cc3ea08eb3a 100644
> > > > > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
> > > > > @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ static void nft_flow_offload_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
> > > > > sizeof(_tcph), &_tcph);
> > > > > if (unlikely(!tcph || tcph->fin || tcph->rst))
> > > > > goto out;
> > > > > + if (unlikely(!nf_conntrack_tcp_established(ct)))
> > > > > + goto out;
> > > >
> > > > This chunk is not required, from ruleset users can do
> > > >
> > > > ... ct status assured ...
> > > >
> > > > instead.
> > >
> > > Maybe this should be mentioned in the manual or wiki if
> > > it is not necessary in the flow offload code.
> >
> > Yes, documentation and wiki can be updated.
> >
> > Users might want to offload the flow at a later stage in the TCP
> > connection.
>
> Well, actually there is not later stage than established, anything
> after established are TCP teardown states.
>
> What's the issue with allowing to offload from SYN_RECV state?
There were multiple problem in general with the code.
flow_offload_fixup_tcp always moves a TCP connection
to established even if it is in FIN or CLOSE.
The flowoffload_del function was always setting the TCP timeout
to ESTABLISHED timeout even when the state was in CLOSE and therefore
creating a very long lasting dead state.
Since we might miss or bump packets to slow path, we do not know
what will happen there when we are still in SYN_RECV.
We will have a better knowledge of the TCP state when we are in
established first and we know that we are either still in it or
we have moved past it to a closing state.
