On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 11:07 PM Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > William Tu <u9012063@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @@ -231,6 +236,12 @@ bool nf_conncount_gc_list(struct net *net, > > if (!spin_trylock(&list->list_lock)) > > return false; > > > > + /* don't bother if we just done GC */ > > + if (time_after_eq(list->last_gc, jiffies)) { > > + spin_unlock(&list->list_lock); > > Minor nit, I think you could place the time_after_eq test before > the spin_trylock if you do wrap the list->last_gc read with READ_ONCE(). Thanks! will do in v2. > > You could also check if changing last_gc to u32 and placing it after > the "list_lock" member prevents growth of the list structure. make sense, will use u32. William