Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c > index f590ee1c8a1b..cdace40c6ba0 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct nft_bitwise { > struct nft_data mask; > struct nft_data xor; > struct nft_data data; > + u8 nbits; > }; > > static void nft_bitwise_eval_bool(u32 *dst, const u32 *src, > @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy nft_bitwise_policy[NFTA_BITWISE_MAX + 1] = { > [NFTA_BITWISE_XOR] = { .type = NLA_NESTED }, > [NFTA_BITWISE_OP] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, > [NFTA_BITWISE_DATA] = { .type = NLA_NESTED }, > + [NFTA_BITWISE_NBITS] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, NLA_U8? Atm values > 255 are accepted but silently truncated to u8.