On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:16:45 +0200 Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmm, after staring at the code for a bit. I could imagine it's due to > > time_t being 32 bit on my platform and nftables trying to stuff a unix > > timstamp with nanosecond resolution in it... > > Will you send a patch? Yes, I already sent one. The mailing list seems to be a bit flacky, did you get it? Regards, Lukas Straub --
Attachment:
pgpkS3RF6RZzR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature