Re: [PATCH nf 1/2] netfilter: nf_tables: registers should not go over NFT_REG32_NUM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 01:53:13PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Bail out in case userspace uses registers over maximum number of register.
> > 
> > Fixes: 49499c3e6e18 ("netfilter: nf_tables: switch registers to 32 bit addressing")
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > index d71a33ae39b3..829ecd310ae6 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > @@ -9275,17 +9275,24 @@ int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int max, u32 *dest)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nft_parse_u32_check);
> >  
> > -static unsigned int nft_parse_register(const struct nlattr *attr)
> > +static unsigned int nft_parse_register(const struct nlattr *attr, u32 *preg)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int reg;
> >  
> >  	reg = ntohl(nla_get_be32(attr));
> > +	if (reg >= NFT_REG32_NUM)
> > +		return -ERANGE;
> > +
> 
> This breaks userspace.
> 
> NFT_REG32_00 is 8, so this makes NFT_REG32_13, 14 and 15 invalid.

Sending v2. Thanks for reviewing



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux