On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:01:48AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > > Le 04/02/2022 à 15:20, Pablo Neira Ayuso a écrit : > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 01:01:26PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > >> Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Le 04/02/2022 à 11:26, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit : > >>>> Available since linux v5.18. > >>>> > >>>> Link: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id= > >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>> > >>> Should I send another patch for the 'set' part? > >>> In this case, a nfq_set_verdict3(). The name is a bit ugly ;-) > >>> Any suggestions? > >> > >> I think we should just let the old api die and tell users > >> to use the mnl interface, that allows to add the new attribute > >> as soon as its available. > > > > We have to provide a simple API based on mnl which ressembles the > > existing old API. > > > > Feedback in these years is that there are a users that do not need to > > know about netlink details / advanced handling. > > If I understand well, libnetfilter_queue is deprecated? This library is not deprecated. > If this is right, maybe it could be advertised on the project page: > https://netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_queue/index.html Documentation already mentions this: https://netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_queue/doxygen/html/
