Re: PROBLEM: Injected conntrack lost helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:08:55AM +0700, Pham Thanh Tuyen wrote:
> > When the conntrack is created, the extension is created before the conntrack
> > is assigned confirmed and inserted into the hash table. But the function
> > ctnetlink_setup_nat() causes loss of helper in the mentioned situation. I
> > mention the template because it's seamless in the
> > __nf_ct_try_assign_helper() function. Please double check.
> 
> Conntrack entries that are created via ctnetlink as IPS_CONFIRMED always
> set on.
>
> The helper code is only exercised from the packet path for conntrack
> entries that are newly created.

I suspect this is the most simple fix, might make sense to also
update the comment of IPS_HELPER to say that it means 'explicitly
attached via ctnetlink or ruleset'.

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -2313,6 +2313,9 @@ ctnetlink_create_conntrack(struct net *net,
 
 			/* not in hash table yet so not strictly necessary */
 			RCU_INIT_POINTER(help->helper, helper);
+
+			/* explicitly attached from userspace */
+			ct->status |= IPS_HELPER;
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* try an implicit helper assignation */



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux