Re: [iptables PATCH v2 00/11] Share do_parse() between nft and legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 04:04:18PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Patch 1 removes remains of an unused (and otherwise dropped) feature,
> yet the change is necessary for the following ones. Patches 2-6 prepare
> for patch 7 which moves do_parse() to xshared.c. Patches 8 and 9 prepare
> for use of do_parse() from legacy code, Patches 10 and 11 finally drop
> legacy ip(6)tables' rule parsing code.

Just two nitpicks in case you would like to apply them before pushing
out.

- Patch #6

diff --git a/iptables/nft-arp.c b/iptables/nft-arp.c
index b211a30937db3..ba696c6a6a123 100644
--- a/iptables/nft-arp.c
+++ b/iptables/nft-arp.c
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ struct nft_family_ops nft_family_ops_arp = {
        .print_rule             = nft_arp_print_rule,
        .save_rule              = nft_arp_save_rule,
        .save_chain             = nft_arp_save_chain,
-       .post_parse             = nft_arp_post_parse,
+       .cmd_parse.post_parse   = nft_arp_post_parse,
        .rule_to_cs             = nft_rule_to_iptables_command_state,
        .init_cs                = nft_arp_init_cs,
        .clear_cs               = nft_clear_iptables_command_state,

I would use C99:

        .cmd_parse              = {
                .post_parse     = nft_arp_post_parse,
        },

for future extensibility, but maybe it is too far fetched.

- Patch #10, instead of:

+       case CMD_NONE:
+       /* do_parse ignored the line (eg: -4 with ip6tables-restore) */
+               break;

this:

+       case CMD_NONE:
+               /* do_parse ignored the line (eg: -4 with ip6tables-restore) */
+               break;

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux