Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: Use max() instead of doing it manually

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: Use max() instead of doing it manually
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 23:31:29 +0100
Cc: kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20211225171241.119887-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 01:12:41AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Fix following coccicheck warning:
> 
> ./include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:282:16-17: WARNING opportunity
> for max().

Applied to nf-next.

References:
- [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: Use max() instead of doing it manually
  - From: Jiapeng Chong

Prev by Date: Re: [conntrack-tools PATCH] conntrackd: cthelper: ssdp: Fix parsing of IPv6 M-SEARCH requests.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/5] netfilter: conntrack related cleanups
Previous by thread: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: Use max() instead of doing it manually
Next by thread: [PATCH] netfilter: extend CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK compile time checks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux